Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques01:08

Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques

1.1K
Accurate analysis of complex samples often requires advanced preparation techniques to achieve reliable and reproducible results. Samples containing inorganic or organic materials can be challenging to dissolve or decompose effectively. Standard sample preparation methods include acid digestion, fusion, dry ashing, and wet digestion.
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
1.1K
Extraction: Advanced Methods00:56

Extraction: Advanced Methods

978
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
978
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

End "reusable" waste dumping in Africa.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Differential analysis of lipid profiles in natural Calculus Bovis and Bovis Calculus Sativus by UHPLC-MS/MS.

Journal of natural medicines·2026
Same author

Ribosome biogenesis mediates the translational increase of nonoptimal codon transcripts during IFN-β stimulation.

Canadian journal of microbiology·2026
Same author

Transgenerational Transfer and Effects of Polystyrene Nanoplastics in the Floating Macrophyte <i>Spirodela polyrhiza</i>.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

PD-1 inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated hypothyroidism is a predictive factor for antitumor effectiveness in male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Oncology letters·2026
Same author

Epidemic features and clinical analysis of pediatric <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> respiratory infection before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic: a 7-year study in southern China.

Translational pediatrics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites
09:39

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites

Published on: November 28, 2014

35.6K

Aqua regia digestion cannot completely extract Hg from biochar: A synchrotron-based study.

Wenfu Liu1, Yu Feng1, Huan Zhong2

  • 1School of Environmental Studies & State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.

Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
|June 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated whether aqua regia digestion fully extracts mercury from biochars, which are carbon-rich materials used in soil and sediment analysis. The researchers found that aqua regia does not completely extract mercury from biochars, with more mercury remaining in biochars produced at higher temperatures. They used advanced imaging and spectroscopy techniques to track mercury distribution and chemical forms. The results showed mercury remained mainly as Hg(II)-Cl complexes after digestion. The study also found that biochars modified with FeSO₄ retained less mercury than those modified with FeCl₃. These findings suggest that aqua regia digestion may not be reliable for measuring total mercury in biochar-containing environmental samples. The researchers recommend caution and further study to improve mercury analysis methods.

Keywords:
Aqua regiaBiocharConfocal micro-X-ray fluorescence imagingExtended X-ray absorption fine structureMercuryaqua regia digestionmercury speciationbiochar analysisenvironmental mercury

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

A Study of the Complexation of MercuryII with Dicysteinyl Tetrapeptides by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
12:59

A Study of the Complexation of MercuryII with Dicysteinyl Tetrapeptides by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Published on: January 8, 2016

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Technologies and Challenges in Elemental Analysis of Food Samples
06:53

Author Spotlight: Technologies and Challenges in Elemental Analysis of Food Samples

Published on: December 22, 2023

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites
09:39

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites

Published on: November 28, 2014

35.6K
A Study of the Complexation of MercuryII with Dicysteinyl Tetrapeptides by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
12:59

A Study of the Complexation of MercuryII with Dicysteinyl Tetrapeptides by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Published on: January 8, 2016

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Technologies and Challenges in Elemental Analysis of Food Samples
06:53

Author Spotlight: Technologies and Challenges in Elemental Analysis of Food Samples

Published on: December 22, 2023

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental chemistry
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Soil science

Background:

Mercury extraction from solid materials is a common analytical task, but the reliability of aqua regia digestion remains uncertain in carbon-rich matrices. Prior research has shown aqua regia is widely used for total mercury analysis, but its effectiveness in carbonaceous materials is debated. No prior work had resolved whether aqua regia fully extracts mercury from biochars. This gap motivated a study to assess extraction efficiency and residual mercury speciation in biochars. The study aimed to clarify whether mercury remains after digestion and how its distribution and speciation change. The study also sought to compare mercury extraction from biochars modified with different iron salts. The research focused on mercury speciation and spatial distribution using synchrotron-based techniques. The findings could help improve mercury analysis in soils and sediments containing biochar.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine whether aqua regia digestion fully extracts mercury from biochars and to characterize any residual mercury. The specific problem addressed was the uncertainty in mercury extraction completeness from carbon-rich materials. The motivation arose from the need for accurate total mercury measurements in environmental samples. The researchers tested biochars modified with iron salts and produced at different temperatures. They wanted to understand how pyrolysis temperature and modification affect mercury extraction efficiency. The study also aimed to identify the speciation of residual mercury after digestion. The researchers used synchrotron-based imaging and spectroscopy to analyze mercury distribution and chemical forms. The goal was to inform best practices for mercury analysis in biochar-containing environmental matrices.

Main Methods:

The study used batch-style experiments to evaluate aqua regia digestion efficiency on mercury-loaded biochars. Biochars were prepared at 300, 600, and 900°C and modified with FeCl₃ or FeSO₄. Each biochar type was spiked with mercury before digestion. Confocal micro-X-ray fluorescence imaging (CMXRFI) was used to map mercury distribution before and after digestion. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy was employed to determine mercury speciation in residual samples. Adsorption analyses confirmed successful mercury loading onto biochars. The extraction efficiency was quantified by comparing mercury concentrations before and after digestion. The study also compared mercury extraction from unmodified, FeCl₃-modified, and FeSO₄-modified biochars. The results were analyzed to determine how pyrolysis temperature and modification influenced mercury retention.

Main Results:

Aqua regia digestion did not fully extract mercury from biochars, with residual mercury remaining after digestion. Biochars pyrolyzed at 600°C retained 60 ± 15% of mercury, while those at 900°C retained 75 ± 22%. Biochars pyrolyzed at 300°C retained only 7 ± 2% of mercury. FeSO₄-modified biochars had significantly lower residual mercury than FeCl₃-modified and unmodified biochars. Confocal micro-X-ray fluorescence imaging showed mercury was concentrated on biochar surfaces before digestion but more evenly distributed afterward. This suggests surface-bound mercury is more easily extracted than internal mercury. EXAFS analysis revealed residual mercury primarily existed as Hg(II)-Cl complexes. The study found mercury extraction efficiency varied with pyrolysis temperature and biochar modification.

Conclusions:

The study found aqua regia digestion does not fully extract mercury from biochars, especially those pyrolyzed at higher temperatures. Residual mercury remained after digestion, with higher retention in biochars produced at 600 and 900°C. The speciation of residual mercury was primarily Hg(II)-Cl, as shown by EXAFS analysis. The results suggest caution when using aqua regia digestion for total mercury analysis in biochar-containing samples. The study also showed FeSO₄-modified biochars retained less mercury than FeCl₃-modified ones after digestion. The spatial distribution of mercury changed from surface-concentrated to more homogeneous after digestion. These findings indicate the need for improved digestion methods for mercury analysis in carbon-rich materials. The authors propose further research to optimize mercury extraction techniques for environmental samples.

The study found aqua regia digestion does not fully extract mercury from biochars, with residual mercury remaining after digestion.

Biochars pyrolyzed at 600°C retained 60 ± 15% of mercury, while those at 900°C retained 75 ± 22% after digestion.

Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy was used to identify mercury speciation in residual samples.

FeSO₄-modified biochars retained significantly less mercury than FeCl₃-modified and unmodified biochars after digestion.

CMXRFI showed mercury was concentrated on biochar surfaces before digestion but more evenly distributed afterward.

The study suggests caution when using aqua regia digestion for mercury analysis in biochar-containing soils and sediments.