Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variation01:19

Variation

7.7K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
7.7K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

184
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
184
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.8K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.8K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

485
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
485
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.9K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reference method matters: DXA system differences influence agreement with 3D optical imaging body composition estimates.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2026
Same author

What is measured and what is estimated in body composition? A clarification framework for terminology and interpretation.

Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders·2026
Same author

ChatGPT, Claude Sonnet, and Grok Display Similarly Low Rates of Accuracy in Identifying Image-Based Orthopaedic Sports Pathologies.

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Declining Medicaid Reimbursement for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty From 2014 to 2022: A Comparison of Expansion and Nonexpansion States.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Within- and between-day reliability of laboratory-based body composition assessment methods.

The British journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Accuracy, repeatability, and interchangeability of smartphone-based digital anthropometry using multi- and dual-image approaches for body fat estimation.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
07:44

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.5K

Explaining Discrepancies Between Total and Segmental DXA and BIA Body Composition Estimates Using Bayesian

Grant M Tinsley1, M Lane Moore2, Zad Rafi3

  • 1Energy Balance & Body Composition Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Journal of Clinical Densitometry : the Official Journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
|June 24, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Lean soft tissue hydration and extracellular fluid content are key factors explaining differences between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) body composition estimates. Understanding these predictors improves the interpretation of body composition data.

Keywords:
Bioimpedancebody fluidsdual-energy X-ray absorptiometryhydrationregional body composition

More Related Videos

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
07:44

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.5K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Body composition analysis
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Human physiology

Background:

  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are common methods for estimating body composition.
  • Discrepancies exist between DXA and BIA estimates, necessitating investigation into their underlying causes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify physiological and anthropometric predictors of discrepancies in total and segmental body composition estimates between DXA and BIA.
  • To enhance the understanding of error sources in these widely used body composition techniques.

Main Methods:

  • 179 adults underwent assessments using DXA and single-frequency BIA.
  • Demographic, anthropometric, and various laboratory measurements (including DXA, BIA, bioimpedance spectroscopy, air displacement plethysmography, and 3D optical scanning) were collected.
  • Bayesian robust regression models with a horseshoe prior were employed to identify significant predictors.

Main Results:

  • Lean soft tissue (LST) hydration and extracellular fluid percentage were significant predictors for discrepancies in both fat mass (FM) and LST estimates.
  • Height was a key predictor for whole-body composition agreement.
  • Segmental LST estimates were influenced by segment mass, length, and composition, though segmental FM predictors were less consistent.
  • Whole-body models demonstrated superior accuracy compared to segmental models.

Conclusions:

  • LST hydration, extracellular fluid content, and height are critical factors explaining the variability between DXA and BIA body composition measurements.
  • The findings provide a quantitative basis for understanding errors in DXA and BIA, aiding in the accurate interpretation of body composition data.
  • This research contributes to a better understanding of the limitations and applications of popular body composition assessment tools.