Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overcoming motion in abdominal MR imaging.

M L Wood1, V M Runge, R M Henkelman

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple-mouse magnetic resonance imaging with cryogenic radiofrequency probes for evaluation of brain development.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions.

Human molecular genetics·2018
Same author

Spatial gene expression analysis of neuroanatomical differences in mouse models.

NeuroImage·2017
Same author

Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same author

Whole-Body Diffusion Imaging Applying Simultaneous Multi-Slice Excitation.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2016
Same author

Whole-Body Diffusion Imaging Applying Simultaneous Multi-Slice Excitation.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2016

Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) acquisition creates ghosting artifacts. Combining various suppression techniques, like physical restraint and gradient rephasing, effectively reduces these artifacts for improved image quality and lesion detection.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Periodic motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data acquisition leads to ghosting artifacts in the phase-encoding direction.
  • Ghost artifact spacing and intensity are directly related to motion cycles and the characteristics of the moving structure.
  • Current methods for motion artifact suppression have limitations, with no single approach being universally satisfactory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize the attributes and limitations of various motion artifact suppression techniques in MRI.
  • To evaluate the theoretical performance and practical applicability of different methods.
  • To provide insights into combining techniques for enhanced artifact reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Review and comparison of existing motion artifact suppression methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of theoretical performance, including ghost intensity reduction and blurring mitigation.
  • Consideration of practical aspects such as imaging time, monitoring requirements, and applicability to different motion types.

    • Main Results:

    • Various methods offer different advantages, such as ghost intensity reduction, blurring mitigation, and reduced imaging time.
    • No single method is completely effective, but combining techniques (e.g., physical restraint with gradient rephasing) can achieve greater suppression.
    • Effectiveness is dependent on the specific circumstances and type of motion encountered.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective motion artifact suppression methods exist, though not all are commercially available.
    • Consistent suppression of motion artifacts enhances MRI image quality, improving lesion detection and overall diagnostic performance.
    • Combining complementary techniques offers a promising strategy for superior motion artifact management in MRI.