Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students
Salah Eldin Kassab1, Mubarak Bidmos1, Michail Nomikos1
1Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Purpose:
Assessment of reflective writing for medical students is challenging, and there is lack of an available instrument with good psychometric properties. The authors developed a new instrument for assessment of reflective writing-based portfolios and examined the construct validity of this instrument.
Methods:
After an extensive literature review and pilot testing of the instrument, two raters assessed the reflective writing-based portfolios from years 2 and 3 medical students (n=135) on three occasions. The instrument consists of three criteria: organization, description of an experience and reflection on the experience. We calculated the reliability of scores using generalizability theory with a fully crossed design and two facets (raters and occasions). In addition, we measured criterion validity by testing correlations with students' scores using other assessment methods.
Results:
The dependability (Φ) coefficient of the portfolio scores was 0.75 using two raters on three occasions. Students' portfolio scores represented 46.6% of the total variance across all score comparisons. The variance due to occasions was negligible, while the student-occasion interaction was small. The variance due to student-rater interaction represented 17.7%, and the remaining 27.7% of the variance was due to unexplained sources of error. The decision (D) study suggested that an acceptable dependability (Φ = 0.70 and 0.72) can be achieved by using two raters for one and two occasions, respectively. Finally, we found moderate to large effect-size correlations between students' scores in reflective writing-based portfolios and communication skills (r = 0.47) and PBL tutorials (r = 0.50).
Conclusion:
We demonstrated the presence of different sources of evidence that support construct validity of the study instrument. Further studies are warranted before utilizing this instrument for summative assessment of students' reflective writing-based portfolios in other medical schools.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
15:00A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Critical Thinking II
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Metacognition
Introspection