Use of diffusion-weighted imaging to distinguish seizure-related change from limbic encephalitis

Adrian Budhram1,2, Jeffrey W Britton3, Greta B Liebo4

  • 1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. adrian.budhram@medportal.ca.

Journal of Neurology
|June 26, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can help distinguish seizure-related signal abnormalities from limbic encephalitis (LE) in patients with medial temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity. Specific diffusion restriction patterns on DWI suggest a peri-ictal phenomenon, prompting seizure investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Neuroradiology
  • Epileptology

Background:

  • Medial temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity can be seen in both peri-ictal states and limbic encephalitis (LE).
  • Differentiating these conditions is crucial for appropriate patient management.
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may offer unique insights into the underlying pathology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating peri-ictal signal abnormalities from limbic encephalitis (LE) in patients presenting with medial temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity.
  • To identify specific DWI patterns associated with seizure activity.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of DWI in patients with medial temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity.
  • Identification of unique diffusion restriction patterns in peri-ictal patients versus LE patients.
  • Confirmation of diffusion restriction patterns by a blinded neuro-radiologist.

Main Results:

  • 90% of patients with peri-ictal T2-hyperintensity showed specific diffusion restriction patterns (gyriform or diffuse hippocampal).
  • Only 9% of LE patients with T2-hyperintensity exhibited one of these patterns (P < 0.0001).
  • These patterns were more prevalent in patients without LE.

Conclusions:

  • Specific DWI diffusion restriction patterns in medial temporal lobe T2-hyperintensity may indicate a peri-ictal phenomenon rather than LE.
  • These findings warrant further investigation for seizure activity.
  • Even in LE, these patterns should raise suspicion for concurrent seizures.