Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Direct Stenting Versus Balloon Pre-Dilatation In Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Khurram Shahzad1, Nadeem Hayat Mallick1, Shahid Amin1
1Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Background:
Stents are now deployed in almost 95% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Recent advances in balloon and stent technology has improved the technique of direct stent (DS) strategy, i.e., stent delivery without pre-dilatation instead of conventional stenting (CS), i.e., stent implantation after balloon pre-dilatation with multiple advantages.
Methods:
This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Cardiology. Department, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore from April to September, 2017. One hundred patients who were being treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled into two Groups e.g., Group I & group II. 50 patients undergoing direct stenting were enrolled in group I and 50 patients undergoing stenting after balloon pre-dilatation were enrolled in group II after randomization. All patients were treated by single type drug eluting or bare metal stents. Chi square test was used for association and t-test for mean difference between two groups in comparison to post dilatation, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, amount of contrast used, procedural success, side branch compromise, slow flow. The p-value of ˂ 0.05 was significant.
Results:
This study consisted of 76 males and 24 females out of a total count of 100, with the average age of 52.2±0.01 years. Overall, 43 (43%) patients were diabetic and overall, 44 (44%) were hypertensive. Most of the patients 55 (55%) had PCI to LAD. Average fluoroscopy time 4.l±2.5 minutes in Group I was significantly lesser as compared to 6.7±3.8 minute group II (p-value <0.05). The average procedure time was also marginally lesser in Group I, 23.4±11.6 in comparison to the second Group 33.7±14 (p-value <0.05). Side branch compromise was observed in 10 (20%) in the first group as compared to 8 (16%) the second group.
Conclusions:
In comparison to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting is a safer and more feasible procedure with respect to radiation exposure, cost and time duration of the procedure.
More Related Videos
06:59Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care