Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.0K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.8K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.8K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.1K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.9K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients Younger than 70 Years in the United States.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Mid-term Outcomes After Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the United States.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Contrasting Impacts of Social Deprivation and Ethnicity on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

CJC open·2026
Same author

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Explant Experience From a High-Volume Structural Heart Center.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2026
Same author

Coronary physiology and intravascular imaging in surgical and percutaneous revascularization.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same author

Robotic Mitral Repair: How I Teach It.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Commentary: Let's not trade one problem for another: Moving beyond P values and confidence intervals

Derrick Y Tam1, Stephen E Fremes1

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|June 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

More Related Videos

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

382
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

382
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.7K