Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025
Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Published on: March 26, 2015
Enhanced Biomechanical Performance of a Modern Polyester Surgical Mesh for Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction in Total
Neal B Naveen1, Evan R Deckard2, Leonard T Buller3
1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Background:
Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating postoperative complication. Reconstruction with a synthetic mesh is one treatment option, although the optimal mesh material remains unknown. This study sought to compare the mechanical properties of 2 mesh material types that can be used for EM reconstruction.
Methods:
Mechanical properties of a polypropylene mesh (Marlex mesh) and Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) mesh were compared using force-displacement data from a material testing machine simulating knee movement during normal human gait. Tension to failure/ultimate tensile load, stiffness coefficients, axial strain, and cyclic hysteresis testing were measured and calculated.
Results:
Compared to polypropylene mesh, LARS mesh demonstrated a significantly higher mean ultimate tensile load (2223 N vs 1245 N, P = .002) and stiffness coefficient (255 N/mm vs 14 N/mm, P = .035) in tension to failure testing, and significantly more energy dissipation (hysteresis) in hysteresis testing (771 kJ vs 23 kJ; P ≤ .040). LARS mesh also demonstrated significantly less maximum displacement compared to the polypropylene mesh (9.2 mm vs 90.4 mm; P ≤ .001).
Conclusion:
Compared to polypropylene mesh, LARS mesh showed superior performance related to force-displacement testing. The enhanced mechanical performance of LARS mesh may correlate clinically to fewer failures, increased longevity, and higher resistance to plastic deformation (extensor lag). Future research should evaluate survivorship and clinical outcomes of these meshes when used for EM reconstruction.
