Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
Published on: December 12, 2012
Chemosensory reception in the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula
María Sol Balbuena1, Walter M Farina1
1Laboratorio de Insectos Sociales, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract:
In stingless bees, unlike honey bees, the relationship between chemosensory abilities and colony labor division has been poorly studied. Here we examined odor reception and gustatory responsiveness of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula focusing on workers, whose are involved in different tasks. Using the proboscis extension response, we studied sucrose response thresholds (SRTs) of foragers and guards. Peripheral responses to odors at the antennae were recorded by electroantennography (EAG). Additionally, we quantified and described the number and type of sensilla present on the antennae using scanning electron microscopy. Foragers' SRTs changed according to the resource collected: nonpollen foragers showed higher SRTs than pollen foragers and guards, that showed similar sucrose responsiveness. EAG signal strength of both foragers and guards increased with increasing odor concentration. Interestingly, guard bees showed the highest response to citral, an odor that triggers defensive behavior in T. angustula. Type and number of sensilla present in the antennae of guards and foragers were similar. Our results suggest that differences found in chemosensory responses among worker subcastes are task dependent.
Related Concept Videos
Tactile and Chemical Senses
Introduction to Special Senses
Olfaction
The olfactory receptors are embedded in the cilia of the...

