Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

09:57
Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities
Published on: July 12, 2018
12.4K
Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles
James M Pflug1, Valerie Renee Holmes2, Crystal Burrus2
1Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 pflugja@gmail.com.
G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|July 1, 2020
Summary
New genome size estimation methods using sequencing data show promise but can underestimate sizes, especially in certain beetle species. Further validation is needed for accurate genomic analysis.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Evolutionary Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Genome size is crucial for understanding genome evolution and guiding sequencing projects.
- Emerging sequence-based methods offer potential for genome size estimation but require empirical validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare next-generation sequencing (k-mer, average read depth) genome size estimation methods against flow cytometry.
- To introduce a new protocol for estimating genome size using read depth of single-copy genes.
- To expand genome size data for ground beetles (Carabidae) and Adephagan beetles.
Main Methods:
- Utilized k-mer methods and average read depth of single-copy genes for genome size estimation.
- Employed flow cytometry as the standard measurement technique.
- Developed and tested a novel read-depth protocol for genome size estimation.
- Generated new draft genomes and transcriptomes for multiple beetle species.
Main Results:
- No single sequence-based method consistently performed well across all tested species.
- Sequence-based methods generally underestimated genome sizes, with significant underestimation in *Bembidion* sp. nr. *transversale*.
- Provided new flow cytometry measurements for five carabid species and new genomic data for eight Adephagan species.
Conclusions:
- Current sequence-based genome size estimation methods require refinement for broader applicability.
- Flow cytometry remains a reliable standard for genome size measurement.
- The study highlights the need for careful method selection and validation in genomic studies.
Related Concept Videos
Flow Cytometry
15.3K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
In...
15.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.7K

