Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

12:29
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
14.1K
Quantification of brain oxygen extraction fraction using QSM and a hyperoxic challenge
Yuhan Ma1, Erin L Mazerolle2, Junghun Cho3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|July 1, 2020
Summary
Hyperoxia combined with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) offers a robust method for measuring oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). This approach is more comfortable and minimally impacts cerebral blood flow compared to hypercapnia.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Medical Physics
- Physiology
Background:
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an MRI technique used to assess magnetic susceptibility variations in tissues.
- Measuring oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) is crucial for understanding brain oxygenation.
- Previous methods for OEF and CMRO2 quantification often involved hypercapnia, which can be uncomfortable for subjects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the use of hyperoxia with QSM for quantifying OEF and CMRO2 in healthy individuals.
- To cross-validate the results obtained using hyperoxia-QSM with those derived from hypercapnia-QSM.
Main Methods:
- Ten healthy subjects underwent 3T MRI scans.
- QSM and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) were used to acquire data during normoxia and hyperoxia (PetO2 = +300 mmHg).
- OEF and CMRO2 maps were computed and compared with hypercapnia-derived values using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis across 16 vascular territories.
Main Results:
- Hyperoxia-QSM yielded physiologically plausible OEF (0.42 ± 0.04) and CMRO2 (181 ± 34 μmol O2/min/100g) values.
- Comparison with hypercapnia-QSM showed small deviations in OEF (0.015) and CMRO2 (4.9 μmol O2/min/100g).
- Good to excellent correlations were observed for regional OEF and CMRO2 between the two methods, with minimal impact on cerebral blood flow (7.5 ± 5.4% reduction).
Conclusions:
- Hyperoxia in conjunction with QSM provides a reliable method for measuring OEF.
- The hyperoxia approach is more patient-friendly and causes less disruption to cerebral blood flow than hypercapnia.

