Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

09:21
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
12.4K
Embolus Retriever with Interlinked Cages (ERIC) versus conventional stent retrievers for thrombectomy: a propensity
Célina Ducroux1, Nicolas Renaud2, Romain Bourcier2
1Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery
|July 2, 2020
Summary
The Embolus Retriever with Interlinked Cages (ERIC) showed similar outcomes to standard stent retrievers (SRs) in stroke thrombectomy. This large study found no significant differences in recanalization, clinical outcomes, or mortality between the devices.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- The Embolus Retriever with Interlinked Cages (ERIC) is a novel device for mechanical thrombectomy.
- ERIC features are designed to improve clot retrieval and reduce distal embolization.
- Comparison with standard stent retrievers (SRs) is crucial for understanding its clinical utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of the ERIC device against standard SRs in acute ischemic stroke.
- To evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes using propensity score matching.
Main Methods:
- A prospective multicenter registry collected data from patients undergoing thrombectomy with ERIC or SRs.
- Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics between groups.
- Outcomes assessed included recanalization (mTICI), procedural complications, functional outcome (mRS), and mortality at 3 months.
Main Results:
- In propensity score-matched and adjusted cohorts, ERIC demonstrated equivalent successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2b), good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2), and 3-month mortality compared to SRs.
- While first-line ERIC use led to higher complete recanalization (mTICI 3), it also required more passes and rescue therapy.
- No significant differences in overall procedural or clinical outcomes were observed between ERIC and SRs.
Conclusions:
- The ERIC device offers comparable angiographic and clinical results to conventional stent retrievers in large-scale thrombectomy procedures.
- ERIC is a viable alternative to standard SRs, with similar safety and efficacy profiles.
- Further research may explore specific indications where ERIC's design offers advantages.

