Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
Do Infants at Risk of Developing Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders Learn What They Practice?
Kristina Löwing1, Linda Holmström1, Rita Almeida2
1Neuropediatric Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Insights
Children at risk of cerebral palsy (CP) learned what they practiced. Mobility training significantly improved gross motor skills more than hand use training, confirming the "learn what you practice" concept.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurorehabilitation
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Motor Learning in Infancy
Background:
- Children at risk for cerebral palsy (CP) and neurodevelopmental disorders often have motor delays.
- Early intervention aims to optimize developmental trajectories.
- The "learn what you practice" hypothesis suggests targeted training enhances specific skill development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if infants at risk for CP learn what they practice, showing faster development in trained areas (hand use or mobility) versus untrained areas.
- To evaluate the impact of targeted hand use and mobility training on motor development in at-risk infants.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of the Small Step Randomized Control Trial involving 19 infants.
- Intervention included targeted hand use and mobility training over six time points.
- Assessed using Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Gross Motor Function Measure-66, and Hand Assessment for Infants.
Main Results:
- Gross motor function improved significantly more after mobility training compared to hand use training.
- Fine motor function showed similar improvements regardless of training type (mobility or hand use).
- Initial training period yielded significant improvements in both gross and fine motor skills, independent of final diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- The "learn what you practice" principle was strongly supported, particularly for gross motor development.
- Targeted motor interventions can lead to specific skill enhancements in infants at risk for developmental disorders.
- Developmental gains were observed irrespective of the child's diagnosis at two years of age.
Abstract:
Through secondary analyses of the Small Step. Randomized Control Trial, we tested the hypothesis that children at risk of developing cerebral palsy (CP) or other neurodevelopmental disorders would learn what they practice, i.e., that they would have a more rapid development within the specifically trained foci (hand use or mobility) of each time period compared to the development rate within the foci not trained at that time. Nineteen infants (6.3 (1.62) months corrected age) included in the Small Step program were assessed at six time points during the intervention. For statistical analysis, general and mixed linear models were used, and the independent variables were the Peabody Developmental Motor scale (stationary, locomotion, grasping and visuomotor sub scales), the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 and the Hand Assessment for Infants. Outcomes related to gross motor function improved significantly more after mobility training than after hand use training, while fine motor function was improved to the same extent following both training types. Significantly higher improvements after the first training period were seen in one out of three outcome measures in both gross and fine motor assessments. The improvements observed were all independent of diagnosis at two years. The concept "you learn what you practice" was most clearly confirmed in the case of gross motor development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Neurulation

