Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Neurodevelopment after a strength-based intervention in children born extremely preterm: a randomised controlled
Anna Hallin Provenzano1,2, Noni Wadström3,4, Kristina Löwing3,5
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.hallin.provenzano@ki.se.
Insights
The Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention did not show short-term neurodevelopmental benefits for extremely preterm infants at 24 months corrected age. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and optimize early support programs.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care and development
- Pediatric neurodevelopmental research
- Intervention studies in preterm infants
Background:
- Extremely preterm birth poses significant risks for neurodevelopmental impairments.
- Early parent-infant interventions may support development, but evidence remains limited.
- The Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention was evaluated for its impact on neurodevelopment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of the Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months corrected age.
- To examine the risk of autism spectrum disorder as a separate outcome.
- To investigate if intervention effects varied based on biological and psychosocial factors.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 130 extremely preterm infants.
- Participants were assigned to either an intervention group (intervention + extended follow-up) or a control group (extended follow-up only).
- Neurodevelopment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 24 months corrected age.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in cognitive, language, or motor development were observed between groups.
- This lack of difference was consistent in the overall cohort and in subgroups, including those at risk for autism spectrum disorder.
- No interaction effects were found concerning biological and psychosocial factors.
Conclusions:
- The intervention did not demonstrate short-term neurodevelopmental benefits at 24 months corrected age in this cohort.
- Long-term follow-up is crucial to evaluate potential delayed effects of the intervention.
- Findings highlight the need for continued evaluation and potential refinement of early support programs for preterm infants.
Background:
Extremely preterm birth increases the risk of neurodevelopmental impairments. Early interventions supporting child and parent may improve child neurodevelopment, but evidence is limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the Stockholm Preterm Interaction-Based Intervention on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months' corrected age. Risk of autism spectrum disorder was examined as separate outcome. We also investigated whether the effect varied according to biological and psychosocial factors including maternal depressive symptoms.
Methods:
This randomised controlled trial included 130 infants born extremely preterm. Participants were randomised to receive either the intervention in addition to an extended follow-up program (intervention group) or solely the extended follow-up program (control group). Neurodevelopment was assessed at 24 months' corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition.
Results:
No significant group differences were found in cognitive, language, or motor development, neither in the overall group nor within the sub-group of children at risk of autism spectrum disorder. No interaction effects by biological and psychosocial factors were observed.
Conclusion:
Neurodevelopmental effects of the intervention were not observed at 24 months' corrected age in our cohort of children born extremely preterm. Follow-up is important to evaluate long-term effects.
Impact Statement:
A strength-based, post-discharge parent-infant intervention showed no short-term effects on neurodevelopment at 24 months' corrected age in children born extremely preterm. This trial contributes to the limited evidence on early, family-centered interventions after extremely preterm birth, indicating that measurable benefits may require longer follow-up or higher intervention intensity. Our findings emphasize the importance of continued longitudinal evaluation and refinement of early support programs to better promote both child development and parental well-being. Around 44% of the children scored below -1 SD indicating risk in cognitive, language or motor development, highlighting the need for interventions and continuous follow-up.
More Related Videos
11:50Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
05:04Enhancing the Development and Growth of Infant Cerebral Palsy Rats Using Selective Spinal Manipulations
Published on: February 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Cerebral Hemispheres
Lateralization
Language and Cognition
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...