Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Recurrent rectourethral fistula repair: A novel technique of gracilis muscle interposition
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU), Ostrovitianov Str. 1, Moscow 117997, Russia; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Leninsky Prosp. 117, Moscow 119571, Russia.
Background:
A perineal approach with gracilis muscle interposition (GMI) remains the most common in recurrent rectourethral fistulas (RUFs). The closure failures in10%-20% cases and urinary incontinence in 10%-80% cases referred to the disadvantages of the perineal approach owing to neurovascular damage. This article shows that the retraction of a survived muscle gracilis flap is one of the causes of fistula recurrence, and a simpler technique of the flap interposition is presented, requiring a less invasive perineal access.
Methods:
Three consecutive patients with RUF at the age of 5, 13 and 15 years who underwent multiple (3, 4 and 5) unsuccessful reconstructive attempts were referred to our clinic. The last procedure was performed with GMI. In all cases, these were acquired iatrogenic fistulas that occurred after operations for Hirschsprung's disease (2) or anorectal malformation (1), and subsequent dilatation of the anus. All patients had a colostomy several years ago. Reinterposition and distant anchoring of the survived graсilis flap were performed through the perineal approach, avoiding lateral and anterolateral dissection.
Results:
The early postoperative period was uneventful. In one patient, a stricture of the posterior urethra formed. Urethrotomy was performed in 3 months, with complete restoration of micturition. The colostomy was closed in all patients after 3-4 months. In the long term follow up within 4-8 years, no fistula recurrence was noted.
Conclusions:
The suggested traction technique of GMI allowed: to minimize the perineal access size, hence minimizing the injury and the operating time; to place the anchoring suture outside of the inflammation zone, ensuring secure attachment; to provide precise flap positioning and intimate contact between the flap and the urethra.
Level Of Evidence:
Level V.

