Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
Published on: December 16, 2022
Cognitive impairment measured by Mini-Cog provides additive prognostic information in elderly patients with heart
Hiroshi Saito1, Masashi Yamashita2, Yoshiko Endo3
1Department of Rehabilitation, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Cognitive impairment (CI) in elderly heart failure patients provides additional prognostic information. The Mini-Cog test is a better tool than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for predicting outcomes in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- Heart failure is a growing concern in elderly populations.
- Prognostic factors in heart failure are well-established, but the role of cognitive impairment is less understood.
- Existing prognostic models may not fully capture the risk in elderly heart failure patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if cognitive impairment (CI) offers additional prognostic value in elderly heart failure patients.
- To compare the efficacy of two cognitive assessment tools, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mini-Cog, in predicting prognosis.
- To evaluate if CI assessment improves existing risk prediction models.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study of 352 heart failure patients aged 75 years and older.
- Cognitive function assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mini-Cog.
- The Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score was used as a baseline prognostic model.
- All-cause mortality was the primary outcome, analyzed using multivariate Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Main Results:
- Nearly half of the elderly heart failure patients exhibited cognitive impairment (47.4% by MMSE, 45.2% by Mini-Cog).
- Cognitive impairment, assessed by both MMSE and Mini-Cog, was independently associated with a worse prognosis (HR: 2.05 and 2.57, respectively).
- The Mini-Cog test demonstrated a significant improvement in risk reclassification when added to the MAGGIC score, outperforming the MMSE.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive impairment is a critical, independent prognostic factor in elderly patients with heart failure.
- The Mini-Cog test is a more effective tool than the MMSE for identifying patients at higher risk of mortality.
- Incorporating cognitive assessment, particularly with the Mini-Cog, can enhance prognostic accuracy in this vulnerable population.
Background:
There has been no study elucidating whether cognitive impairment (CI) can provide additive prognostic information besides that provided by preexisting prognostic factors in elderly patients with heart failure. This study examined whether CI can provide additive prognostic information in elderly patients with heart failure.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective study included 352 patients with heart failure aged ≥75 years. We administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mini-Cog test to assess CI. The Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score was used as a model to incorporate the preexisting prognostic factors. All-cause mortality was considered the prognostic outcome.
Results:
The median age was 85 years old, 47.7% were male. According to MMSE and Mini-Cog, 167 (47.4%) and 159 (45.2%) patients had CI, respectively. The agreement between MMSE and Mini-Cog was fairly low (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.37). During the follow-up period of median 346 days, 53 patients (15.1%) died. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, CI defined by MMSE and Mini-cog were individually associated with worse prognosis in older heart failure patients even after adjustment for MAGGIC risk model and log B-type natriuretic peptide levels [CI defined by MMSE, HR: 2.05 (95%CI: 1.16-3.61); and CI defined by Mini-Cog, HR:2.57 (95%CI: 1.46-4.53)]. The area under the curve of receiver operator characteristics curve was numerically greater for Mini-Cog than for MMSE (0.59 vs. 0.52, p = 0.109). Moreover, significant net reclassification improvement was observed when CI defined by Mini-Cog, but not on CI defined by MMSE, was added to the MAGGIC score, and when Mini-Cog, instead of MMSE, was used as a CI assessment tool (0.41, p = 0.004).
Conclusions:
Among elderly hospitalized patients with heart failure, CI should be considered as a critical factor for prognosis prediction. Mini-Cog is a potentially preferable tool to assess CI in terms of providing prognostically relevant information compared to MMSE.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

