Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

568
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
568
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

471
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
471
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

460
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
460
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

469
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
469
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

303
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
303
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

899
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
899

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating statistical models for overdispersed multi-omics data: a multiplex immunofluorescence case study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Site- and age-dependent associations between Fusobacterium nucleatum and colorectal cancer mortality.

Cancer·2026
Same author

Alcohol consumption and molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer: pooled observational and Mendelian randomization analyses.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same author

MyGeneRisk Colon: A Web-Based Tool for Personalized Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Based on Genetics and Lifestyle.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Design of MOSAAIC (Multi-Ethnic Observational Study in American Asian and Pacific Islander Communities).

JACC. Asia·2026
Same author

TGF-β Pathway-Based Polygenic Risk Score Modifies the Association between Red Meat Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Application of a Novel Pathway-Based PRS Method.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

408

Multinomial logistic regression with missing outcome data: An application to cancer subtypes.

Ching-Yun Wang1, Li Hsu1

  • 1Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses missing disease subtype data in heterogeneous diseases like cancer. New methods like bootstrap hot deck multiple imputation (BHMI) and weighted estimators provide unbiased and efficient risk analysis.

Keywords:
hot deck multiple imputationinverse probability weightingmissing at random

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

562
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

408
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

562
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Disease heterogeneity, such as in cancer and heart disease, necessitates subtype-specific risk analysis.
  • Missing subtype data due to logistical or cost constraints presents a significant challenge in epidemiological studies.
  • Understanding genetic and environmental risk factors requires accurate subtype classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare statistical methods for multinomial logistic regression with missing outcome data.
  • To evaluate the performance of bootstrap hot deck multiple imputation (BHMI) and various weighted estimators (SIPW, AIPW, EEE).
  • To assess the bias and efficiency of these methods compared to complete-case analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Bootstrap hot deck multiple imputation (BHMI) for valid confidence interval estimation.
  • Simple inverse probability weighted (SIPW), augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW), and expected estimating equation (EEE) estimators.
  • Application of nonparametric smoothers for continuous covariates to estimate selection probabilities and scores.

Main Results:

  • All investigated methods (BHMI, SIPW, AIPW, EEE) yield unbiased estimators.
  • Complete-case (CC) analysis can be biased when missingness depends on observed data.
  • The proposed methods offer substantial efficiency gains over CC analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical methods like BHMI and weighted estimators effectively handle missing disease subtype data.
  • These approaches provide unbiased and more efficient risk factor analysis in heterogeneous diseases.
  • The methods are applicable to real-world studies, such as colorectal cancer research with missing subtype information.