Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Antithrombotic treatment in patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis
Dimitrios Sagris1, Georgios Georgiopoulos1, Ioannis Leventis1
1From the Department of Internal Medicine (D.S., I.L., K.M., G.N.), Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (G.G.), King's College, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics and Research Support (K.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; biostatistics consultant (L.A.P.), Minot, ND; Department of Clinical Therapeutics (E.K., K.V.), Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece; Imperial College London (E.K.), UK; and Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine (H.M.), University of Ioannina, Greece.
Insights
Oral anticoagulants did not reduce recurrent ischemic stroke risk compared to antiplatelets in patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis. However, anticoagulants significantly increased the risk of major bleeding events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Atherosclerosis in the aortic arch or cervical/intracranial arteries (supracardiac atherosclerosis) is a risk factor for stroke.
- The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis remains debated.
- Oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets are commonly used to prevent secondary stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets in patients experiencing stroke with co-existing supracardiac atherosclerosis.
- To evaluate the impact of these treatments on recurrent ischemic stroke, major ischemic events or death, and bleeding complications.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus up to August 28, 2019.
- Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets in stroke patients with supracardiac atherosclerosis.
- Meta-analysis using random-effects models was performed to estimate treatment effects (relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]).
Main Results:
- Ten RCTs involving 6,068 patients were included.
- Recurrent ischemic stroke rates were similar between anticoagulant and antiplatelet groups (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-1.18).
- Major bleeding rates were significantly higher in the anticoagulant group compared to the antiplatelet group (RR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.96-5.24).
Conclusions:
- In patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis, oral anticoagulants do not offer a significant benefit in reducing recurrent ischemic stroke compared to antiplatelets.
- The use of oral anticoagulants is associated with a substantially increased risk of major bleeding.
- Current evidence suggests antiplatelet therapy may be a safer alternative for stroke prevention in this patient population.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants vs antiplatelets in patients with stroke and atherosclerotic plaques in the aortic arch or cervical or intracranial arteries, collectively described as supracardiac atherosclerosis.
Methods:
We searched PubMed and Scopus until August 28, 2019, for randomized trials comparing oral anticoagulants vs antiplatelets in patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis using the terms "anticoagulant or anticoagulation" and "antiplatelet or aspirin" and "randomized controlled trial or RCT" and "stroke or cerebral ischemia" and "aortic or carotid or vertebrobasilar or intracranial or atherosclerosis or stenosis or arterial." Four outcomes were assessed: recurrent ischemic stroke, major ischemic event or death, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Treatment effects (relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were estimated by meta-analysis using random-effects models.
Results:
Among 1,117 articles identified in the literature search, results from 10 randomized controlled trials involving 6,068 patients with stroke/TIA with supracardiac atherosclerosis were included in the meta-analysis. Recurrent ischemic stroke rates were 2.94 per 100 patient-years in the anticoagulant-assigned patients vs 3.30 per 100 patient-years in the antiplatelet-assigned patients (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-1.18 for the SJ estimator, I2 = 26%). Major ischemic event or death rates were 4.39 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients vs 4.32 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.35; I2 = 54.5%). Major bleeding rates were 2.88 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients vs 0.82 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (RR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.96-5.24; I2 = 46%).
Conclusion:
This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that anticoagulant-assigned patients with stroke and supracardiac atherosclerosis were not at different risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and increased risk of major bleeding compared to antiplatelet-assigned patients.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

