Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

10:44
Snap Chip for Cross-reactivity-free and Spotter-free Multiplexed Sandwich Immunoassays
Published on: November 13, 2017
6.7K
The Immunoprobe Aggregation State is Central to Dipstick Immunoassay Performance
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|July 8, 2020
Summary
Improving nanoparticle-antibody immunoprobes for paper immunoassays is crucial for rapid infectious disease detection. Nanoparticle colloidal stability significantly impacts assay performance, affecting signal intensity and reliability.
Area of Science:
- Nanotechnology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Immunodiagnostics
Background:
- Infectious disease outbreaks necessitate rapid diagnostic tools.
- Paper-based immunoassays offer advantages in cost and scalability but face sensitivity challenges.
- Understanding molecular mechanisms can enhance immunoassay development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how synthesis strategy and surface chemistry affect nanoparticle-antibody immunoprobes in paper immunoassays.
- To quantify the impact of these factors on antigen binding affinity and immunoprobe distribution.
- To identify key factors influencing immunoassay performance.
Main Methods:
- Conjugation of gold nanoparticles to antibodies (anti-IgG, anti-Zika NS1) via electrostatic adsorption, NHS, and Hz chemistries.
- Utilizing these immunoprobes in paper dipstick immunoassays.
- Quantifying effective antigen affinity and immunoprobe distribution on test lines.
Main Results:
- Nanoparticle colloidal stability is a critical factor influencing immunoassay results.
- Instability post-synthesis and during antigen binding leads to reduced or lost assay signals.
- Surface chemistry and synthesis strategy directly impact immunoprobe behavior and assay sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing nanoparticle colloidal stability is essential for improving paper-based immunoassay performance.
- Understanding immunoprobe behavior at the molecular level can accelerate diagnostic test development.
- This research provides insights for creating more sensitive and reliable rapid diagnostic tools.
Related Concept Videos
Immunoprecipitation
6.5K
Immunoprecipitation, or IP, is a widely used technique that employs protein-antibody interactions to isolate proteins or protein complexes in their native state for studying protein-protein interactions, quaternary structures, or supramolecular complexes. Various modifications of the technique, including chromatin IP, cross-linking IP, and fluorescence IP, are commonly used.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...
6.5K
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
17.0K
In 1971, Peter Perlman and Eva Engvall developed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA or EIA). ELISA differs from western blot in that the assays are conducted in microtiter plates or in vivo rather than on an absorbent membrane.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or...
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or...
17.0K
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
13.1K
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are techniques that use antibodies to check for specific proteins or antigens in a sample. The technique was first published by Albert Coons in 1941 to detect the presence of pneumococcal antigen in tissue sections from mice infected with Pneumococcus. Immunocytochemistry helps localization of proteins or antigens in individual cells like blood cells, stem cells, etc., while immunohistochemistry does the same for tissue samples.
These...
These...
13.1K

