Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Induction and Diverse Assessment Indicators of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Published on: September 9, 2022
Initial high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide cohort study
Mathias Due Buron1, Thor Ameri Chalmer2, Finn Sellebjerg2
1From the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry (M.D.B., T.A.C., M.M.) and Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.D.B., T.A.C., F.S., J.R.C., R.C., P.S.S., M.M.), Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet; Department of Neurology (I.B., V.H., J.S.), Aalborg University Hospital; Department of Neurology (M.K.C., T.P., P.V.R.), Aarhus University Hospital; Department of Neurology (Z.I., V.P., Á.T.), Odense University Hospital; Brain and Nerve Diseases (H.B.J.), Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding; Institute of Regional Health Research (H.B.J.), University of Southern Denmark, Odense; Department of Neurology (M.K.), Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sønderborg; and Department of Neurology (A.W.), Herlev Hospital, Denmark. mathias.buron@regionh.dk.
Starting high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMT) significantly reduces disability worsening and relapses in treatment-naive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients compared to medium-efficacy therapies (meDMT). This finding supports early use of heDMT for better MS management.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) management involves selecting disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) based on efficacy.
- Treatment-naive patients represent a critical group for initial therapeutic decisions.
- Understanding the comparative effectiveness of high-efficacy (heDMT) versus medium-efficacy (meDMT) DMTs is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of heDMTs versus meDMTs as first-line treatments in treatment-naive MS patients.
- To evaluate the impact of initial heDMT versus meDMT on disability progression and relapse rates.
- To assess outcomes using a nationwide population-based registry.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide, population-based multiple sclerosis registry was utilized.
- Patients initiating heDMT as first-time treatment were identified and compared to a propensity score-matched sample of patients starting meDMT.
- Outcomes including 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening and first relapse were analyzed over 4 years.
Main Results:
- A total of 388 patients were included (194 heDMT initiators, 194 meDMT initiators).
- The probability of 6-month confirmed EDSS worsening was significantly lower for heDMT initiators (16.7%) compared to meDMT initiators (30.1%) (HR 0.53, p=0.006).
- Patients initiating heDMT also showed a lower probability of a first relapse (HR 0.50).
Conclusions:
- Initiating high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMT) as first-line treatment in treatment-naive multiple sclerosis patients leads to a lower probability of disability worsening and relapses compared to medium-efficacy DMTs (meDMT).
- These findings suggest that early treatment with heDMT may be more beneficial for long-term disease management in MS.
- The study provides Class III evidence supporting the use of heDMT over meDMT for initial therapy in MS.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
08:18A Protocol for the Use of Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS in Multiple Sclerosis MS
Published on: December 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids