Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

7.0K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
7.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

16.9K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
16.9K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

867
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
867
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

460
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
460
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning regularities in noise engages both neural predictive activity and representational changes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Non-specific increase in alpha power during a neurofeedback session targeting its downregulation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Flexible statistical learning across modalities: Online and offline measures reveal different aspects of adaptation to changing regularities.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Spontaneous Modulation of Alpha Power During a Neurofeedback Session Without Instructions.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Statistical learning performance is impacted by a previous learning experience: A predictive eye-movement study.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Preserved statistical learning in preterm children aged 4-6 years: Evidence from neural and behavioral measures.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: The Effect of Response-code on Stroop Interference and Facilitation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 15, 2025

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns
06:22

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns

Published on: January 9, 2019

6.1K

Detection of regularities in a random environment.

Arnaud Rey1,2, Louisa Bogaerts3, Laure Tosatto1,2

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS & Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical learning, or regularity detection, is key to cognition. This study found that detecting predictable letter triplets amidst random information was surprisingly difficult, highlighting the limits of statistical learning.

Keywords:
Regularity detectionimplicit learningstatistical learning

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.5K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 15, 2025

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns
06:22

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns

Published on: January 9, 2019

6.1K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.5K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Statistical learning is crucial for cognitive function.
  • Detecting patterns in complex environments is essential for survival.
  • Previous research often uses controlled settings, limiting ecological validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate statistical learning in a more naturalistic setting.
  • To assess the ability to detect a regular letter triplet embedded in random sequences.
  • To explore the influence of contextual information on pattern detection.

Main Methods:

  • A Hebb-naming task was employed, requiring participants to name single letters.
  • A predictable three-letter sequence (triplet) was presented repeatedly.
  • Variable numbers of random letters were interspersed between triplet repetitions.
  • Naming times were recorded to infer learning of the triplet pattern.

Main Results:

  • Statistical learning of the triplet occurred only under specific experimental conditions.
  • Pattern detection was not a trivial task for participants.
  • The presence of random information significantly impacted regularity detection.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical learning has inherent limitations.
  • Contextual information plays a critical role in the detection of repeated patterns.
  • Ecological settings present unique challenges for regularity detection.