Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
An efficacious horizontal angulation separated radiographically superimposed canals in upper premolars with different
Piyanuch Karnasuta1, La-Ongthong Vajrabhaya1, Watcharin Chongkonsatit1
1College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Thailand.
Objectives:
To determine the effect of various horizontal beam angulations on radiographically separating superimposed canals in upper premolars with different external root morphologies.
Materials And Methods:
The independent variables were 1) three different external root morphologies of upper premolars (n = 30); one-root (A), fused-root (B) and two-root (C), 2) thirteen angulations (0° and mesial (Ms) and distal (Ds) shifts of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40°), and 3) the superimposed canal at the apex (apx) and 5-mm from the apex (5apx). The dependent variables were the percentage of radiographs demonstrating canal separation. The separated canal distances were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD.
Results:
Separation distances at apx and 5apx on one-root, fused-root and two-root premolar radiographs increased as the angulation increased. Ms angulations generated a higher separation distance (SepDist) in mm compared with the Ds angulations. Significantly different separation distances were observed from various horizontal shift angulations (p < 0.05). Percentage of canal separation from 0o was achieved differently in different morphology of upper premolars (14-80%) at apx and 10-40% at 5apx. The 20-40Ms/Ds and 25Ds/30‒40Ms/Ds resulted in 100% of radiographs with canal separation for two-root and fused-root premolars, respectively, at apx and 5apx. Only the 35/40Ms resulted in 100% of radiographs with separation at apx in one-root teeth.
Conclusion:
The ideal horizontal angulation which revealed the superimposed canal at the apx/5apx for one-root, fused-root, and two-root teeth are 35M/35M, 20D/20M, and 15M/20M, respectively.
Significance:
The 25Ms was the optimal angulation which strongly recommended with the highest probability of separation and acceptable image quality in endodontic and prosthodontic treatment for unknown morphologies evaluated.
