Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Deficient Pms2, ERCC1, Ku86, CcOI in Field Defects During Progression to Colon Cancer
Published on: July 28, 2010
Next generation sequencing to decipher concurrent loss of PMS2 and MSH6 in colorectal cancer
Esther Moreno1, Juan M Rosa-Rosa2, Tamara Caniego-Casas1,3
1Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Carr de Colmenar Viejo, km. 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Background:
Immunohistochemistry (IHQ) is commonly used for the detection of mismatch repair proteins deficiency (MMRD). One very infrequent abnormal pattern of MMR protein expression is the loss of PMS2 and MSH6, with intact expression of MLH1 and MSH2.
Case Presentation:
We review the frequency of this MMRD IHC pattern among 108 colorectal (CRCs) and 35 endometrial cancers in our files with loss of expression of at least one protein, and present two CRCs showing loss of PMS2 and MSH6 protein expression (1.9% of CRCs). NGS analysis of these tumours identified PMS2 mutations (R134* germline mutation in one tumour and M1R and c.1239delA somatic mutation in the other) as the primary event and somatic MSH6 mutation (c.3261dupC) as the secondary event in both tumours.
Conclusions:
This study suggests that Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) tumour analysis should be considered in the algorithm of Lynch syndrome screening to detect MMR gen somatic mutation in inconclusive cases.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

