Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Simulation in the Continuing Professional Development of Academic Emergency Physicians: A Canadian National Survey
Chantal Forristal1, Evan Russell, Tamara McColl
1From the Division of Emergency Medicine (C.F., K.W.), Department of Medicine, Western University, London; Department of Emergency Medicine (E.R., A.S., A.K.H.), Queen's University, Kingston; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.M.), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg; Division of Emergency Medicine (A.P.), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario; Department of Emergency Medicine (B.T.), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; Division of Emergency Medicine (K.C.), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton; Department of Emergency Medicine (G.M.), University of Ottawa, Ottawa; Department of Emergency Medicine (T.C.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.H.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Emergency Medicine (C.D.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Introduction:
Simulation is becoming a popular educational modality for physician continuing professional development (CPD). This study sought to characterize how simulation-based CPD (SBCPD) is being used in Canada and what academic emergency physicians (AEPs) desire in an SBCPD program.
Methods:
Two national surveys were conducted from March to June 2018. First, the SBCPD Needs Assessment Survey was administered online to all full-time AEPs across 9 Canadian academic emergency medicine (EM) sites. Second, the SBCPD Status Survey was administered by telephone to the department representatives (DRs)-simulation directors or equivalent-at 20 Canadian academic EM sites.
Results:
Response rates for the SBCPD Needs Assessment and the SBCPD Status Survey were 40% (252/635) and 100% (20/20) respectively. Sixty percent of Canadian academic EM sites reported using SBCPD, although only 30% reported dedicated funding support. Academic emergency physician responses demonstrated a median annual SBCPD of 3 hours. Reported incentivization for SBCPD participation varied with AEPs reporting less incentivization than DRs. Academic emergency physicians identified time commitments outside of shift, lack of opportunities, and lack of departmental funding as their top barriers to participation, whereas DRs thought AEPs fear of peer judgment and inexperience with simulation were substantial barriers. Content areas of interest for SBCPD were as follows: rare procedures, pediatric resuscitation, and neonatal resuscitation. Lastly, interprofessional involvement in SBCPD was valued by both DRs and AEPs.
Conclusions:
Simulation-based CPD programs are becoming common in Canadian academic EM sites. Our findings will guide program coordinators in addressing barriers to participation, selecting content, and determining the frequency of SBCPD events.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

