Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
F-16XL Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation on Unstructured Grids.
Michael A Park1, Khaled S Abdol-Hamid1, Alaa Elmiligui1
1NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681.
Advanced aerodynamic simulations using Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and Modified Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (MDDES) accurately predicted swept wing flight test data. These methods outperformed the Spalart-Allmaras model, offering crucial insights into complex vortex dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Aerospace Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
- Fluid Mechanics
Background:
- The Cranked Arrow Wing Aerodynamics Program, International (CAWAPI) investigates swept wing aerodynamics.
- Understanding complex flow phenomena like vortex dynamics is crucial for aircraft design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive capabilities of different computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for swept wing aerodynamics.
- To fuse flight test, wind tunnel, and simulation data for a comprehensive analysis.
Main Methods:
- Simulations were performed using FUN3D and USM3D flow solvers.
- Aerodynamic performance was analyzed using Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), Modified Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (MDDES), and Spalart-Allmaras (SA) RANS models.
- Flow visualization utilized Q criterion isosurfaces to depict vortex structures.
Main Results:
- DES and MDDES models showed improved pressure prediction accuracy compared to the SA model, particularly on the outer wing sections.
- FUN3D simulations predicted more broadband noise, while USM3D simulations exhibited sharper tonal noise.
- Time-averaged forces were similar between solvers, with FUN3D predicting slightly higher lift and lower drag.
Conclusions:
- DES and MDDES are more effective than the SA model for simulating swept wing aerodynamics at high angles of attack.
- Differences in noise spectra between FUN3D and USM3D highlight distinct flow physics predictions.
- The study provides valuable data for validating and improving CFD tools for complex aerodynamic investigations.
Related Concept Videos
Navier–Stokes Equations
Laminar and Turbulent Flow
Turbulent Flow
Turbulent Flow: Problem Solving
Temperature is a key factor in CO2 solubility. In this case, the CO2 gas and the liquid are cooled to 20°C. Lower temperatures enhance...
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Couette Flow

