Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
Sixth Drag Prediction Workshop Results Using FUN3D with k-kL-MEAH2015 Turbulence Model.
K S Abdol-Hamid1, Jan-Reneé Carlson2, Christopher L Rumsey3
1Senior Research Scientist, Configuration Aerodynamics Branch, Mail Stop 499. Associate Fellow AIAA. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23681.
The k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model accurately simulates wing-root flow, but grid resolution is critical for reliable aerodynamic predictions. Further analysis explored a nonlinear variant for improved drag and lift accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
- Aerospace Engineering
- Turbulence Modeling
Background:
- The Common Research Model (CRM) wing/body configuration is a standard benchmark in aerodynamic research.
- Accurate prediction of turbulent flow is essential for aircraft design and performance optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of the k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model for the CRM configuration.
- To evaluate the impact of a nonlinear quadratic constitutive relation variant on aerodynamic predictions.
- To assess the influence of grid resolution on simulation accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of the k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model in the FUN3D CFD code.
- Utilizing workshop-provided grids and performing uniform grid refinement studies.
- Comparison of results with and without a reconstruction limiter.
- Analysis of a nonlinear quadratic constitutive relation variant against the linear eddy-viscosity model.
Main Results:
- A significant variation in results was observed on medium grids without a reconstruction limiter, highlighting their inadequacy for experimental comparison.
- Grid refinement reduced the observed variations, indicating its importance for accurate simulations.
- The nonlinear quadratic constitutive relation variant showed decreased lift and drag compared to the linear model, with this difference remaining consistent across grid refinements.
- The k-kL-MEAH2015 model successfully replicated wing-root junction flow behavior observed in wind-tunnel experiments.
Conclusions:
- The k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model demonstrates good agreement with experimental data for wing-root flow.
- Careful consideration of grid resolution is crucial for obtaining reliable aerodynamic predictions.
- The nonlinear variant offers potential for improved lift and drag prediction accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Drag
Laminar and Turbulent Flow
Typical Model Studies
Turbulent Flow
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:

