Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
Sixth Drag Prediction Workshop Results Using FUN3D with k-kL-MEAH2015 Turbulence Model
K S Abdol-Hamid1, Jan-Reneé Carlson2, Christopher L Rumsey3
1Senior Research Scientist, Configuration Aerodynamics Branch, Mail Stop 499. Associate Fellow AIAA. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23681.
Abstract:
The Common Research Model wing/body configuration is investigated with the k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model implemented in FUN3D. This includes results presented at the Sixth Drag Prediction Workshop and additional results generated after the workshop with a nonlinear quadratic constitutive relation variant of the same turbulence model. The workshop-provided grids are used, and a uniform grid refinement study is performed at the design condition. A large variation between results with and without a reconstruction limiter is exhibited on "medium" grid sizes, indicating that the medium grid size is too coarse for drawing conclusions in comparison with experiment. This variation is reduced with grid refinement. At a fixed angle of attack near design conditions, the quadratic constitutive relation variant yielded decreased lift and drag compared with the linear eddy-viscosity model by an amount that was approximately constant with grid refinement. The k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model produced wing-root junction flow behavior consistent with wind-tunnel observations.
Related Concept Videos
Drag
Laminar and Turbulent Flow
Typical Model Studies
Turbulent Flow
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:

