Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
A multiverse analysis of early attempts to replicate memory suppression with the Think/No-think Task
Ineke Wessel1, Casper J Albers2, Anna Roos E Zandstra1
1Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Replicating the Think/No-think (TNT) task, this study found memory suppression effects were inconsistent, especially when using independent probes. This challenges inhibition theory
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Memory Research
Background:
- The Think/No-think (TNT) task, introduced by Anderson and Green (2001), demonstrated memory suppression.
- The existing literature on the TNT task primarily features positive findings, with few null results reported.
- This study addresses the need for more comprehensive reporting, including unpublished replications and diverse analytical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the replicability and robustness of the memory suppression effect observed in the TNT task.
- To explore the impact of different probing methods (Same Probes vs. Independent Probes) on the suppression effect.
- To evaluate the implications of the findings for inhibition theory and the concept of repression as a forgetting mechanism.
Main Methods:
- Conducted unpublished replications of the TNT task (N=49, N=36) and reanalyzed two published studies (N=68, N=80).
- Employed a multiverse analysis approach to explore various data-analysis solutions for the TNT task data.
- Differentiated between recall probed with studied cues (Same Probes, SP) and recall probed with novel cues (Independent Probes, IP).
Main Results:
- Statistically significant memory suppression effects were observed with Same Probes in some or all tests across samples 2, 3, and 4, but not consistently in sample 1.
- Recall probed with Independent Probes predominantly yielded non-significant suppression effects across all samples.
- The findings highlight variability in the suppression effect depending on the probing method and sample characteristics.
Conclusions:
- The inconsistent and predominantly non-significant suppression effects with Independent Probes challenge the core tenets of inhibition theory.
- The results question the viability of repression as a significant mechanism of forgetting, as suggested by inhibition theory.
- The study emphasizes the importance of transparent reporting, including pre-registration, data, and analysis code, to ensure research integrity.
More Related Videos
10:38A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
Counterfactual Thinking