Short-term and long-term outcomes of bailout versus planned coronary rotational atherectomy

Zhanru Qi1, Hongyan Zheng1, Zhonghai Wei1

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, P. R. China.

Insights

Planned rotational atherectomy (RA) is safer than bailout RA, reducing dissection risk and procedure time without impacting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or mortality. This finding supports planned RA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technique used to treat complex coronary artery lesions.
  • The decision to use RA can be either planned or as a bailout strategy following procedural complications.
  • Understanding the comparative outcomes of planned versus bailout RA is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes between planned and bailout rotational atherectomy (RA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • To evaluate the incidence of procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality in both groups.
  • To assess the impact of RA strategy on procedural time.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study including 211 patients who underwent PCI with RA from November 2011 to December 2018 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital.
  • Patients were categorized into planned RA (before balloon pre-dilation) and bailout RA (after procedural failure) groups.
  • In-hospital and long-term MACE (cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) were compared.

Main Results:

  • The bailout RA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of coronary dissection (22.4% vs. 6.5%, P=0.001) compared to the planned RA group.
  • No significant differences were observed in in-hospital MACE (12.1% vs. 13.7%, P=0.752), all-cause mortality (9.1% vs. 12.5%, P=0.504), or long-term MACE (13.8% vs. 17.1%, P=0.560) between the groups.
  • Bailout RA was associated with a significantly longer procedural time (139.86 ± 56.24 min vs. 105.56 ± 36.71 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Planned RA is associated with a lower incidence of coronary dissection and shorter procedural times compared to bailout RA.
  • Both planned and bailout RA strategies demonstrate similar rates of in-hospital and long-term MACE and mortality.
  • The findings suggest that a planned approach to RA may offer procedural advantages without compromising patient safety regarding major adverse cardiac events.