Short-term and long-term outcomes of bailout versus planned coronary rotational atherectomy
Zhanru Qi1, Hongyan Zheng1, Zhonghai Wei1
1Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, P. R. China.
Insights
Planned rotational atherectomy (RA) is safer than bailout RA, reducing dissection risk and procedure time without impacting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or mortality. This finding supports planned RA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technique used to treat complex coronary artery lesions.
- The decision to use RA can be either planned or as a bailout strategy following procedural complications.
- Understanding the comparative outcomes of planned versus bailout RA is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes between planned and bailout rotational atherectomy (RA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To evaluate the incidence of procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality in both groups.
- To assess the impact of RA strategy on procedural time.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study including 211 patients who underwent PCI with RA from November 2011 to December 2018 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital.
- Patients were categorized into planned RA (before balloon pre-dilation) and bailout RA (after procedural failure) groups.
- In-hospital and long-term MACE (cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) were compared.
Main Results:
- The bailout RA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of coronary dissection (22.4% vs. 6.5%, P=0.001) compared to the planned RA group.
- No significant differences were observed in in-hospital MACE (12.1% vs. 13.7%, P=0.752), all-cause mortality (9.1% vs. 12.5%, P=0.504), or long-term MACE (13.8% vs. 17.1%, P=0.560) between the groups.
- Bailout RA was associated with a significantly longer procedural time (139.86 ± 56.24 min vs. 105.56 ± 36.71 min, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Planned RA is associated with a lower incidence of coronary dissection and shorter procedural times compared to bailout RA.
- Both planned and bailout RA strategies demonstrate similar rates of in-hospital and long-term MACE and mortality.
- The findings suggest that a planned approach to RA may offer procedural advantages without compromising patient safety regarding major adverse cardiac events.
Abstract:
The goal of this study was to compare in-hospital and long-term events between bailout rotational atherectomy (RA) and planned RA. In this retrospective study, All patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from November 2011 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. Planned RA was defined as RA performed immediately before balloon pre-dilation, while bailout RA was defined as RA after failure to expand the balloon or perform any other procedure. In-hospital and long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke) were compared between the two groups. After statistical analysis, a total of 211 patients underwent PCI with RA during the study period: 153 in the planned RA group, and 58 in the bailout group. The incidence of coronary dissection was significantly higher in the bailout RA group than in the planned RA group (22.4% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference in in-hospital MACE was found between the two groups (12.1% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.752). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (9.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.504) or long-term MACE (13.8% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.560) between the groups. Bailout RA was associated with a significantly longer procedural time (139.86 ± 56.24 min vs. 105.56 ± 36.71 min, P < 0.001) than planned RA. Therefore, compared with bailout RA, planned RA is associated with shorter procedural time and reduced incidence of coronary dissection, with no difference in MACE or mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


