Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

11:34
Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
Published on: May 15, 2017
11.4K
Predictive Models for the Characterization of Internal Defects in Additive Materials from Active Thermography
Manuel Rodríguez-Martín1,2, José G Fueyo1, Diego Gonzalez-Aguilera3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 26, 2020
Summary
This study introduces predictive models for detecting internal defects in additive manufacturing using active transient thermography. Machine learning models effectively assess defect size, aiding non-destructive testing.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Non-Destructive Testing
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Additive manufacturing (AM) enables complex geometries but poses challenges in defect detection.
- Internal defects can compromise the structural integrity of AM components.
- Active transient thermography is a promising non-destructive testing (NDT) method for subsurface defect characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare predictive models for assessing the thickness and length of internal defects in AM materials.
- To evaluate the performance of various machine learning algorithms integrated with finite element simulation.
- To identify optimal predictive methods for defect characterization using thermographic data.
Main Methods:
- Generation of predictive models using data from active transient thermography numerical simulations.
- Integration of finite element (FE) simulation with machine learning (ML) models, including regression, Gaussian regression, support vector machines (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF).
- Statistical analysis and comparison of model performance based on predictive accuracy, processing time, and outlier sensitivity.
Main Results:
- Interaction linear regression was the best model for predicting defect thickness using six thermal features.
- Gaussian process regression excelled in predicting both defect length and thickness.
- Support vector machines demonstrated significant advantages in processing time and performance for specific feature sets.
Conclusions:
- The developed predictive models, leveraging active thermography and machine learning, can effectively detect and measure internal defects in additive manufacturing materials.
- The choice of the best predictive model depends on specific requirements, balancing accuracy, processing time, and feature set.
- This hybrid approach offers a viable non-destructive testing solution for quality control in additive manufacturing.

