Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Cell Death01:30

Overview of Cell Death

8.9K
Cell death is an essential process where the body gets rid of old or damaged cells. Cell proliferation and death need to be balanced, as an imbalance between the two may lead to cancer or autoimmune diseases.
Cell death was observed in the early 19th century, but there was no experimental evidence to prove it. In 1842, Carl Vogt first discovered cell death in a metamorphic toad; however, it was not termed ‘cell death.’ Scientists discovered different cell death pathways only in the...
8.9K
Apoptosis01:30

Apoptosis

13.4K
Apoptosis is a combination of two Greek words, 'apo' and 'ptosis,' meaning separation and falling off, respectively. Hippocrates used this word to describe gangrene, which was caused due to bandaging of fractured bones. Apoptosis was distinguished from necrosis in 1970 when John Kerr reported observations of morphological changes occurring during apoptosis. During one experiment, he observed that the disruption of blood supply to the liver tissue resulted in a size...
13.4K
Necrosis01:16

Necrosis

5.9K
Necrosis is considered as an “accidental” or unexpected form of cell death that ends in cell lysis. The first noticeable mention of “necrosis” was in 1859 when Rudolf Virchow used this term to describe advanced tissue breakdown in his compilation titled “Cell Pathology”.
Morphological Manifestations of Necrosis
Necrotic cells show different types of morphological appearance depending on the type of tissue and infection. In coagulative necrosis, cells become...
5.9K
Autophagic Cell Death01:18

Autophagic Cell Death

4.1K
Christian de Duve discovered “autophagy,” a process in which cellular components are engulfed by membrane-bound organelles called autophagosomes. The autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes to digest the enclosed contents. Autophagy is generally activated in cells to prevent cell death. However, cell death is triggered when the damage is beyond repair.
Autophagy and Apoptosis
Autophagy can activate apoptosis. In normal conditions, the autophagy activating protein Beclin-1 and...
4.1K
Zygotic Development And Stem Cell Formation01:10

Zygotic Development And Stem Cell Formation

6.2K
The development of all multicellular organisms starts with the fusion of haploid cells called sperm and egg to form a diploid zygote. A zygote is a totipotent cell that can develop into a complete organism. The zygote undergoes cell division or cleavage to form an 8-cell mass. Until this stage, the cells are spherical, loosely attached, and remain totipotent. Totipotent cells are capable of developing both the embryonic and the extraembryonic tissues. However, as they continue to divide, they...
6.2K
Caspases01:24

Caspases

13.4K
Caspase, a family of cysteine proteases, serve as effectors in apoptosis. The ced3 gene in C.elegans was first identified to be involved in apoptosis. This gene encodes the ced-3 caspase that is similar to the interleukin-1-beta converting enzyme or ICE in mammals. In addition to apoptosis, caspases also function in the inflammatory response. Inflammatory caspases are essential in activating pro-inflammatory cytokines that recruit immune cells and block the replication of pathogens inside...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>C. elegans</i> E3 ubiquitin ligase EBAX-1 promotes non-apoptotic linker cell-type death through target-directed miRNA degradation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Non-apoptotic death of the <i>C. elegans</i> linker cell is primed by MYRF-1 activation of <i>pqn-41</i>/polyQ.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

EOR-1/PLZF promotes WAH-1/AIF-dependent compartment-specific corpse clearance.

Cell death discovery·2025
Same author

CED-3 caspase promotes dismantling but not onset of non-apoptotic linker cell death in <i>C. elegans</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Radial-glia-to-astrocyte trans-differentiation and astrocyte transcriptional convergence are coordinated by CEH-43/DLX in <i>C. elegans</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

CDH-3/cadherin, YAP-1/YAP, and EGL-44/TEAD promote SYX-2/syntaxin and EFF-1 fusogen-mediated phagosome closure.

Genetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Use of LysoTracker to Detect Programmed Cell Death in Embryos and Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells
12:44

Use of LysoTracker to Detect Programmed Cell Death in Embryos and Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 11, 2012

23.8K

Cell death in animal development.

Piya Ghose1, Shai Shaham2

  • 1Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, 655 Mitchell St., Arlington, TX 76019, USA piya.ghose@uta.edu shaham@rockefeller.edu.

Development (Cambridge, England)
|July 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This article provides an overview of how cell death functions as a normal part of animal development, distinguishing it from cell death caused by injury or disease. It clarifies the terminology used to describe these processes and discusses how understanding these natural mechanisms can help explain developmental disorders and human diseases.

Keywords:
ApoptosisCaspaseCell compartment eliminationCell deathLCDLinker cell-type deathNon-apoptotic cell deathPathological cell deathprogrammed cell deathtissue morphogenesisdevelopmental biologyevolutionary selection

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Analysis of Apoptosis in Zebrafish Embryos by Whole-mount Immunofluorescence to Detect Activated Caspase 3
08:20

Analysis of Apoptosis in Zebrafish Embryos by Whole-mount Immunofluorescence to Detect Activated Caspase 3

Published on: December 20, 2013

20.4K
In Vivo Biosensor Tracks Non-apoptotic Caspase Activity in Drosophila
13:21

In Vivo Biosensor Tracks Non-apoptotic Caspase Activity in Drosophila

Published on: November 27, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Use of LysoTracker to Detect Programmed Cell Death in Embryos and Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells
12:44

Use of LysoTracker to Detect Programmed Cell Death in Embryos and Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 11, 2012

23.8K
Analysis of Apoptosis in Zebrafish Embryos by Whole-mount Immunofluorescence to Detect Activated Caspase 3
08:20

Analysis of Apoptosis in Zebrafish Embryos by Whole-mount Immunofluorescence to Detect Activated Caspase 3

Published on: December 20, 2013

20.4K
In Vivo Biosensor Tracks Non-apoptotic Caspase Activity in Drosophila
13:21

In Vivo Biosensor Tracks Non-apoptotic Caspase Activity in Drosophila

Published on: November 27, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental biology and cell death mechanisms
  • Evolutionary biology and developmental cell death research

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved how programmed cell death shapes animal development. That uncertainty drove researchers to examine how specific mechanisms contribute to tissue formation. It was already known that massive cell loss occurs during normal growth. Prior research has shown that over eighty percent of cells in certain tissues undergo programmed elimination. This gap motivated a closer look at the distinction between physiological and pathological death. That ambiguity hindered progress in understanding how these processes differ. Prior research has shown that many death pathways are primarily studied in disease states. This gap motivated the current synthesis to clarify which mechanisms are truly developmental.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the roles and regulation of cell death during animal development. This work addresses the confusion surrounding the numerous mechanisms identified in recent research. The authors seek to clarify the terminology used to describe these diverse biological processes. They intend to distinguish between developmental pathways that have undergone evolutionary selection and those resulting from injury. The researchers aim to synthesize recent findings that the field is currently grappling with. This effort is motivated by the need to better understand the molecular basis of developmental abnormalities. They also hope to provide insights into how these natural processes relate to pathological cell death in disease. The study serves as a primer to guide future investigations into these complex regulatory systems.

Main Methods:

The authors conduct a comprehensive review of the current literature regarding programmed cell death. This review approach involves synthesizing findings from diverse studies to categorize various death mechanisms. The investigators evaluate evidence for evolutionary selection to distinguish developmental pathways from injury-induced loss. They examine the terminology used across different subfields to identify inconsistencies. The researchers analyze the molecular players involved in regulating these processes during organismal growth. This review approach focuses on clarifying which pathways are active during normal physiological development. They compare these developmental mechanisms against those observed in pathological or experimental settings. The authors synthesize these data to provide a structured overview of the field.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that cell death is a critical component of normal animal development. The authors report that in specific developing tissues, the final fate of over eighty percent of generated cells is elimination. They highlight that while many death mechanisms exist, only a small number are responsible for driving standard developmental processes. The researchers observe that most known pathways are primarily documented in pathological contexts rather than physiological ones. They find that distinguishing between evolutionarily selected mechanisms and injury-induced death remains a significant challenge. The authors report that current terminology is often inconsistent across different research studies. They identify a need for clearer definitions to separate developmental cell death from damage-related loss. The researchers synthesize data showing that these natural processes are distinct from those triggered by genetic, chemical, or physical harm.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that developmental cell death is a distinct biological process shaped by evolutionary selection. They suggest that distinguishing these pathways from injury-induced death is necessary for future research. The researchers argue that current terminology requires standardization to avoid confusion in the field. They propose that developmental cell death mechanisms are fundamentally different from those triggered by chemical or physical harm. The authors suggest that insights into these natural processes may illuminate the origins of developmental abnormalities. They propose that understanding these pathways could clarify the molecular basis of various human diseases. The researchers argue that addressing current conceptual challenges will advance the field of developmental biology. They suggest that future studies should focus on identifying the specific molecular players involved in these selective processes.

The researchers propose that developmental cell death is a distinct, evolutionarily selected process, whereas injury-induced death results from external genetic, chemical, or physical damage. This distinction helps clarify which mechanisms are truly part of normal tissue formation versus those occurring in pathological contexts.

The authors discuss various molecular players and regulatory pathways that govern these processes. They emphasize that while many mechanisms exist, only a small subset specifically drives normal development, contrasting with the broader range of pathways observed in disease states.

The authors suggest that standardizing terminology is necessary to distinguish between evolutionarily selected developmental mechanisms and accidental cell loss. This clarity is required to prevent misinterpretation of findings when comparing physiological development to pathological injury.

The researchers utilize existing literature to synthesize current knowledge on cell death types. This review approach serves to categorize the diverse mechanisms and identify which pathways have evidence for evolutionary selection during organismal growth.

The authors note that in some tissues, over 80% of generated cells are eliminated. This high rate of turnover illustrates the magnitude of cell death required for proper tissue sculpting during animal development.

The authors propose that understanding these natural mechanisms may provide insights into the molecular basis of developmental abnormalities. They suggest this knowledge could eventually help explain how pathological cell death contributes to various human diseases.