Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Semi-Minimal Invasive Method to Induce Myocardial Infarction in Rats and the Assessment of Cardiac Function by an Isolated Working Heart System
Published on: June 11, 2020
Heart team 2.0: A decision tree for minimally invasive and hybrid myocardial revascularization
Jef Van den Eynde1, Johan Bennett2, Keir McCutcheon3
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Research Unit of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Insights
This review discusses evolving myocardial revascularization options for complex coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with comorbidities. A new decision tree integrates minimally invasive strategies like MIDCAB and PCI for optimal patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Increasing complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with comorbidities and frailty.
- Development of minimally invasive strategies like Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MIDCAB) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on outcomes, indications, benefits, and risks of various myocardial revascularization strategies.
- To propose a new decision-making tool for Heart Teams incorporating minimally invasive options.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive review of existing evidence on off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), MIDCAB, PCI, and hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR).
- Incorporation of Heart Team experiences and recent advances in minimally invasive revascularization.
Main Results:
- Discussion of the evidence regarding outcomes, indications, benefits, and risks of OPCAB, MIDCAB, PCI, and HCR.
- Proposal of a novel decision tree to guide the selection of revascularization strategies.
Conclusions:
- Current guidelines inadequately address the integration of new minimally invasive strategies.
- The proposed decision tree facilitates optimal patient care and resource utilization for individual needs.
Abstract:
Recent years have seen an important shift in the target population for myocardial revascularization. Patients are increasingly presenting with more complex coronary artery disease (CAD), but also with multiple comorbidities and frailty. At the same time, minimally invasive strategies such as Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MIDCAB) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) have been developed, which might be more appealing for this group of patients. As a result, the landscape of options for myocardial revascularization is evolving while adequate use of all resources is required to ensure optimal patient care. Heart Teams are confronted with the challenge of incorporating the new minimally invasive strategies into the decision process, yet current guidelines do not fully address this challenge. In this review, the current evidence regarding outcomes, indications, benefits, and risks of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), MIDCAB, PCI, and hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) are discussed. Based on this evidence and on experiences from Heart Team discussions, a new decision tree is proposed that incorporates recent advances in minimally invasive revascularization strategies, thereby optimizing adequate delivery of care for each individual patient's needs. Introducing all important considerations in a logical way, this tool facilitates the decision-making process and might ensure appropriate use of resources and optimal care for individual patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

