Management of Bladder Bowel Dysfunction in Children by Pelvic Floor Interferential Electrical Stimulation and Muscle

Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian1, Lida Sharifi-Rad2, Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh1

  • 1Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Children's Medical Center, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (IRI).

Urology
|July 28, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Combined pelvic floor interferential (IF) electrical stimulation and muscle exercises effectively treat pediatric bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD). This approach significantly improved constipation, daytime incontinence, and urinary tract infections in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation
  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Background:

  • Bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) significantly impacts children's quality of life.
  • Current treatments for pediatric BBD include behavioral therapies and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises.
  • The efficacy of combined therapies needs further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of combining pelvic floor interferential (IF) electrical stimulation with PFM exercises for treating BBD in children.
  • To compare the outcomes of this combined therapy against PFM exercises alone.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled study included 34 children diagnosed with BBD.
  • Participants were assigned to either IF electrical stimulation plus PFM exercises (Group A) or PFM exercises alone (Group B).
  • Evaluations included ultrasounds, uroflowmetry with electromyography (EMG), and voiding/bowel habit diaries, assessed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6-month follow-up.

Main Results:

  • Group A showed significantly higher improvement rates in constipation (82% vs. 47%, P=.03) and daytime incontinence (100% vs. 25%, P=.007) compared to Group B.
  • Urinary tract infection resolution was also superior in Group A (80% vs. 38.4%, P=.02) at 6 months.
  • No significant differences in uroflowmetry measures were observed between groups post-treatment.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of IF electrical stimulation and PFM exercises is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric BBD.
  • This integrated approach offers superior outcomes for constipation, incontinence, and UTIs compared to PFM exercises alone.
  • Further research can explore long-term effects and optimal parameters for IF electrical stimulation in pediatric BBD management.
Abstract