Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional electrical stimulation of the soleus redistributes lower limb joint work distally in young and older adults.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2025
Same author

Predatory behavior, nesting habits, and impacts on honey bees (Apis mellifera) of an invasive hornet (Vespa tropica) on the island of Guam.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Prediction of knee loads during activities of daily living using custom instrumented insoles and machine learning.

Journal of biomechanics·2025
Same author

Activity Type Effects Signal Quality in Electrocardiogram Devices.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Gender differences in peak medial joint contact forces during activities of daily living.

PeerJ·2025
Same author

Greater external negative mechanical work is accompanied by a greater metabolic cost of walking for socket-suspended versus bone-anchored prosthesis users with transfemoral limb loss.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2025
Same journal

Erratum. Validity of Poststroke Gait Spatiotemporal and Joint Excursion Metrics Between Inertial Measurement Units and a Marker-Based System.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Different Starting Block Distances on Internal Tibial Load in Elite Sprinters.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Altered Lower-Limb Dynamics in Stop-Jump Activity of Adolescents With Major Thoracic Scoliosis.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Differences During Overground Walking in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Study With a Real Environment.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Relative Schoolbag Mass on Gait Biomechanics of South African Adolescents: The Role of Sex and Grade.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.4K

Standardized Lab Shoes Do Not Decrease Loading Rate Variability in Recreational Runners.

Jessica G Hunter1, Alexander M B Smith1, Lena M Sciarratta1

  • 1University of Maryland.

Journal of Applied Biomechanics
|August 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized lab shoes may alter running mechanics, showing lower vertical average loading rates compared to normal shoes. This suggests lab testing might underestimate actual runner loads.

Keywords:
gait kineticsrunning injuriesrunning shoesvertical average loading rate

More Related Videos

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

789
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.4K
Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
06:53

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Published on: February 28, 2025

789
Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
08:26

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running

Published on: July 17, 2020

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Science
  • Running Physiology

Background:

  • Running mechanics studies often use standardized lab shoes to minimize subject variance.
  • However, lab shoes may lead to unnatural running mechanics, potentially affecting study outcomes.
  • Understanding the impact of footwear on running biomechanics is crucial for accurate research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare key running parameters—step rate, vertical average loading rate, and ground contact time—between standardized lab shoes and participants' normal running shoes.
  • To determine if lab shoes influence the biomechanical load experienced by runners.
  • To assess the variance in running outcomes across different shoe conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Participants ran overground at a self-selected speed in both standardized lab shoes and their own running shoes.
  • Ground reaction forces were measured to calculate biomechanical parameters.
  • Student's t-tests were employed to compare outcomes between the two shoe conditions.

Main Results:

  • The vertical average loading rate was significantly lower when running in lab shoes (42.09 BW/s) compared to normal shoes (47.35 BW/s), P = .013.
  • Step rate (170.92 vs 168.98 steps/min, P = .053) and ground contact time (253 ms vs 251 ms, P = .5227) were similar between the two shoe conditions.
  • The variance of all measured outcomes was comparable across both lab and normal shoe conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized lab shoes may underestimate the vertical average loading rate experienced by runners during typical use.
  • Current lab shoe protocols might not accurately reflect real-world running loads.
  • Further research is needed to validate footwear choices in running biomechanics studies.