Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.7K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.7K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.6K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.6K
Depressive Disorders: Etiology01:27

Depressive Disorders: Etiology

331
Depressive disorders result from a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors, each contributing uniquely to the development and persistence of the condition. Understanding these factors provides critical insight into the multifaceted nature of depression.
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
331
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

492
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
492
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

7.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
7.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does intranasal oxytocin reduce symptoms of mental disorders? A meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Preventive interventions for vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors: a cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge, crossover trial of 73 sites involving 1·4 million donors in England.

The Lancet. Haematology·2026
Same author

Role of pain and anxiety in mediating relationships between donation history and vasovagal reaction symptoms in blood donors in England.

Transfusion·2025
Same author

Rumination in response to repugnant obsessions: Catching the sneakiest of compulsions.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2025
Same author

Development and validation of the multidimensional Fear of Depression Recurrence Questionnaire (FoDRQ).

Cognitive behaviour therapy·2025
Same author

Update and validation of the Beliefs about Losing Control Inventory-II (BALCI-II): a psychometric investigation.

Cognitive behaviour therapy·2024
Same journal

Cracking the Repetitive Negative Thinking Code: Keys to Understanding Anxiety and Depression.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Effects of Reducing Social Media Use in Women With Depressive Symptoms.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder in U.S. Military Veterans: A Multiple Baseline Study.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Memory and Metamemory in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Cognitive Intervention via Mobile App for Eating Disorders: An Exploratory Case Series in Remission-Phase Patients.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Life Goals Collaborative Care for a Veteran With Bipolar Disorder: A Case Illustration.

Journal of cognitive psychotherapy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats
07:57

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats

Published on: February 22, 2018

21.8K

Prediction Errors in Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.

Adam S Radomsky1, Shiu F Wong1, Dominique Dussault1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
|August 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals with depression overestimate the effort required for simple tasks, unlike controls. This cognitive bias in effort prediction, not reward, may impact depression treatment strategies.

Keywords:
behavior therapycognitive behavioral therapycognitive biascognitive distortiondepressionprediction

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats
07:57

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats

Published on: February 22, 2018

21.8K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Anxiety disorders are linked to distorted predictions of emotional experiences (fear, pain).
  • Cognitive biases in prediction may play a role in the etiology and maintenance of mental health conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate effort and reward prediction biases in individuals with depression.
  • To extend previous findings on prediction errors to the context of depression.

Main Methods:

  • Compared prediction accuracy between a group of individuals with depression (n=20) and a control group (n=40).
  • Participants predicted effort, reward, and enjoyment for a short walk.
  • Actual experienced effort, reward, and enjoyment were reported post-task.

Main Results:

  • Depressed individuals significantly overpredicted the effort required for the walk.
  • Control participants demonstrated accurate effort predictions.
  • No significant differences were found in reward or enjoyment predictions between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Depression is associated with an overprediction bias specifically for effort, not reward.
  • Findings suggest effort overprediction is a cognitive characteristic of depression.
  • Implications for cognitive and behavioral therapies for depression are discussed.