Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

650
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
650
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

900
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
900
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

35.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
35.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is AI making us stupid?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same author

Consistently mapped but consistently demanding: Predicting skilled performance.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Task, person, and experiential characteristics drive the transfer of learning.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Recent discoveries on the acquisition of the highest levels of human performance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Communicating science, not magic.

Communications psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

How do task characteristics affect learning and performance? The roles of simultaneous, interactive, and continuous

David J Frank1,2, Brooke N Macnamara3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology and Special Education, Texas A&M University Commerce, Binnion Hall 218, P.O. Box 3011, Commerce, TX, 75429, USA. David.Frank@TAMUC.edu.

Psychological Research
|August 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Learning complex tasks is challenging. Simultaneous tasks, requiring multitasking, significantly hinder learning, slow performance, and increase errors, unlike continuous or interactive task features.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning Science
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Task difficulty influences learning and performance.
  • Previous research identified consistent/variable mapping and static/dynamic features as dimensions of difficulty.
  • Understanding additional task characteristics is crucial for optimizing learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of sequential vs. simultaneous, discrete vs. continuous, and separable vs. interactive task features on learning and performance.
  • To isolate the effect of simultaneity on learning a new task, controlling for other difficulty dimensions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic manipulation of single task features (dimensions of difficulty) while keeping others constant.
  • Controlled experimental studies to assess learning, performance speed, and errors.
  • Examination of simultaneous task demands without perceptual or mechanical limitations.

Main Results:

  • Continuous task features slowed performance but did not impair learning.
  • Interactive task features did not negatively impact learning or performance compared to separable ones.
  • Simultaneous tasks (multitasking) significantly inhibited learning, reduced performance speed, and increased errors.

Conclusions:

  • Simultaneity is a critical dimension of difficulty that negatively affects learning and performance.
  • Findings challenge existing theories and have implications for designing effective training programs in various domains.
  • Future research should consider simultaneity when developing accelerated expertise training.