His bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Jinlei Qi1, Xinwei Jia2, Zhanqi Wang2
1Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Heibei University, Yu Hua Street, Baoding, China. qijinlei93@qq.com.
Insights
His bundle pacing (HBP) is a feasible option for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a good success rate. This therapy effectively narrows QRS duration and improves heart function, though further trials are needed for comparison.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) is an emerging alternative for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with CRT indications.
- Existing data on HBP for CRT is limited to small, single-center studies, necessitating a systematic examination of its clinical benefits and risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review published studies on His bundle pacing (HBP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of HBP as a CRT strategy.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and WANFANG databases up to December 2019.
- Meta-analysis of 13 studies involving 503 patients, focusing on implant success, QRS duration, pacing thresholds, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), NYHA status, complications, and mortality.
- Data analysis performed using Revman5.3 software.
Main Results:
- The average implant success rate for HBP was 79.8%.
- HBP significantly reduced mean QRS duration (165.5 ms to 122.9 ms) and improved NYHA functional class, LVEF, and LVEDD at follow-up.
- A trend of increased capture thresholds was observed, with increased HB capture threshold being the most common complication.
Conclusions:
- His bundle pacing (HBP) is a feasible and effective option for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a reasonable success rate.
- HBP demonstrates significant benefits in narrowing QRS duration and improving left ventricular function.
- Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to compare the efficacy of HBP against biventricular pacing (BVP) for CRT.
Background:
Permanent His bundle pacing has been to shown to be an alternative for the patients with CRT indications and more recently has been evaluated for feasibility as a first-line strategy. Data on His bundle pacing (HBP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy are largely limited to small single-center reports, and clinical benefits and risks have not been systematically examined. The purpose of this study was to systematically review published studies of HBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy and evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the therapy.
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and WANFANG databases were searched up to December 2019 to identify relevant studies. Clinical outcomes of interest include implant success rate; Q wave, R wave, and S wave QRS duration; pacing thresholds; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD); and New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, complications, and mortality. Extract and summarize the data. Using Revman5.3 software to perform the meta-analysis.
Results:
A total of 13 studies involving 503 patients were included. The average implant success rate was 79.8% (95% CI 72.4-87.2%). Permanent HBP resulted in a significant narrow of mean QRS duration from 165.5 ± 8.7 to 122.9 ± 12.0 ms (MD = 43.5, 95%Cl: 36.34 ~ 50.56, p < 0.001). A trend of increase was observed in capture thresholds at follow-up compared with that in the baseline threshold (MD = - 0.24, 95% Cl: - 0.38 ~ - 0.10, p = 0.001). Average NYHA functional class (MD = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.09 ~ 1.31, p < 0.001), LVEF (MD = - 12.60, 95% Cl: - 14.32 ~ - 10.87, p < 0.001), LVEDD (MD = 4.30, 95% Cl: 3.05 ~ 5.55, p < 0.001) significantly improved at > 3 months follow-up compared with that of the baseline (p < 0.001). Ten studies reported safety information and the most commonly reported complication was the increase in HB capture threshold.
Conclusions:
HBP is feasible with a reasonable success rate in patients requiring CRT. HBP could achieve significant narrow of QRS duration and improve left ventricular function during follow-up. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further assess the efficacy of HBP compared with that of biventricular pacing (BVP) in achieving CRT. Graphical abstract Schematic representation of detecting ofloxacin (OFL) by differential pulse voltammetry approach based on the laser modified glassy carbon electrode (LGCE), which increased the active functional groups and surface area compared to GCE.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias


