Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.9K
Trimmed Mean01:10

Trimmed Mean

3.2K
While measuring the mean of a data set, care needs to be taken when associating the mean to its central tendency. The same goes for the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, or the harmonic mean. This is because the presence of a single outlier data value can significantly affect the mean. That is, the mean is sensitive to fluctuations in the data set.
Although certain measures of central tendency are not sensitive to outliers, there are alternative versions of the mean that get around the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective Study of Multiparametric Renal MRI for CKD Progression (AFiRM).

Kidney international reports·2026
Same author

Estimating the Sodium Content: A Case Series of Benign and Malignant Renal Tumours Using <sup>23</sup>Na-MRI at 3 T.

NMR in biomedicine·2026
Same author

A disease-centric vision-language foundation model for precision oncology in kidney cancer.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Simultaneous Intracranial Angiography and Susceptibility Imaging (SIAS) by Combining Velocity-Selective ASL and Multi-Echo SWI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Adaptive Respiratory Motion Correction Framework for Ungated Hepatic 4D Flow MRI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Slow-Flow-Sensitive Artery-Vein-Separated Velocity Mapping (SAM) Phase Contrast MR Angiography: Initial Evaluation of Hand Vasculature.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

723

Subtractive NCE-MRA: Improved background suppression using robust regression-based weighted subtraction.

Hao Li1, Shuo Wang1,2, Martin J Graves1,3

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|August 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robust regression using the deviation angle effectively suppresses background signals in non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography. This method improves image quality by accurately differentiating vascular signals from background tissues across various imaging sequences.

Keywords:
MR angiographybackground suppressionnon-contrast-enhancedrobust regression

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.0K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

879

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

723
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.0K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

879

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image Processing

Background:

  • Subtractive non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) techniques can suffer from static background signal intensity differences between bright and dark blood images.
  • This difference can compromise the quality of subtracted angiograms and hinder accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To improve static background signal suppression in subtractive CE-MRA.
  • To achieve this by correcting intensity differences between bright and dark blood images using robust regression (RR).

Main Methods:

  • Robust regression (RR) with iteratively reweighted least squares was employed to determine background tissue signal.
  • Two weighting functions were evaluated: Euclidean distance and deviation angle.
  • Performance was assessed by comparing RR results against manually determined reference values across thoracic, iliac, and femoral datasets.

Main Results:

  • RR using the deviation angle (RRDA) demonstrated robust and accurate performance across all tested image types, showing minimal bias and high correlation with reference values.
  • RRDA effectively suppressed background tissues (muscle, veins, bladder) while preserving vascular signals.
  • Conventional RR with Euclidean distance performed well for thoracic and iliac datasets but failed in femoral imaging, while ordinary least squares regression was sensitive to outliers.

Conclusions:

  • Weighted subtraction utilizing RR successfully corrects background signal intensity differences, enhancing background suppression in CE-MRA.
  • RRDA emerged as the most robust and accurate regression method for improving subtractive CE-MRA techniques.