Related Experiment Video For CT
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
FDG PET/CT and CT Findings of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Differentiation
Hongjing Zhu1, Shuai Zhao1, Changjing Zuo1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, No. 168, Changhai Rd, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and enhanced CT in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation and the differential diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Among patients with renal tumors confirmed by pathologic examination from September 2010 to August 2019, 29 patients with RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and 82 patients with ccRCC who underwent FDG PET/CT, renal contrast-enhanced CT examination, or both, before surgery were studied. Features of the two groups on CT and PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS. The tumor size of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation was larger than that of ccRCC (p = 0.0086). Cystic necrosis, peritumoral neovascularity, and metastasis were more common in RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation (p = 0.0052, p = 0.0008, p < 0.0001, respectively). The ratio of necrotic area to tumor diameter of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation was statistically significantly larger than that of ccRCC (p = 0.0032). Three cases of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation showed a large central necrotic area and dense intratu-moral neovascularity in the surrounding parenchyma, defined as the ring-of-fire sign, which was not found in ccRCC. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation were statistically significantly higher than those for ccRCC (all p < 0.0001), and the SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak cutoff values of 5.4, 4.2, and 5.0, respectively, were helpful for discrimination. CONCLUSION. Imaging features including higher SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak; a larger ratio of necrotic area to tumor diameter; the presence of peritumoral neovascularity; and metastasis are more commonly associated with RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation than with ccRCC. The ring-of-fire sign and SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak cutoff values of 5.4, 4.2, 5.0, respectively, may be helpful to indicate RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
17:13Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET
Published on: April 28, 2013