Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining memory specificity and generalization contributions to false recall in DRM paradigm.

Research square·2026
Same author

FDA Approval of Respiratory Biosimilars-Turning the Tide of Cost-Effectiveness?

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Medicaid Coverage and Utilization for Novel Therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

Investigating the role of attentional effort in the efficacy of goal-setting in reducing attention lapses.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Individual differences in attention and learning: A latent variable analysis.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

CMS Exclusion of Global Period Visits From E/M Payment Reform: Estimated Payment Loss for Pediatric Otolaryngologists.

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K

Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry.

Nash Unsworth1, Ashley L Miller2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. nashu@uoregon.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|August 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Pupillary responses reveal how attention shifts during learning. This research shows that pupil dilation tracks attention allocation, demonstrating flexible cognitive strategies during memory encoding.

Keywords:
AttentionMemorySerial position effects

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding attention allocation during memory encoding is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Pupillary responses have been proposed as a non-invasive measure of cognitive effort and attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how pupillary responses reflect attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall tasks.
  • To explore the relationship between presentation duration, list length, and attention during learning.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using pupillary responses as the primary measure.
  • Participants engaged in free recall tasks with manipulated presentation durations and list lengths.
  • Pupillary responses were analyzed across serial positions to infer attention allocation patterns.

Main Results:

  • Pupillary responses varied with serial position, suggesting dynamic attention allocation.
  • Increased presentation duration led to larger and more sustained pupillary responses, indicating greater cognitive engagement.
  • List length manipulations influenced attention, with shorter lists showing different patterns than longer lists.

Conclusions:

  • Pupillary responses effectively track attention allocation during memory encoding.
  • Individuals flexibly adjust their attention based on task demands and processing strategies.
  • This study highlights the utility of pupillometry in understanding cognitive processes during learning.