The Art and Science of Selecting a CD123-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor for Clinical Testing

Janice M Riberdy1, Sheng Zhou2, Fei Zheng2

  • 1Department of Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.

Insights

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells targeting CD123 show promise for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Researchers developed and tested several CD123-CAR T-cell constructs, selecting the 28.28z CAR for a clinical trial due to superior cell surface expression.

Area of Science:

  • Immunotherapy
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells offer a promising therapeutic strategy for refractory/recurrent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by targeting the CD123 antigen.
  • The development of effective CAR T-cell therapies requires careful optimization of CAR construct design, including the choice of costimulatory and hinge/transmembrane domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generate and evaluate novel CD123-specific CAR T-cell constructs for potential AML treatment.
  • To compare the efficacy and safety of different CAR T-cell designs, including those with various costimulatory and hinge/transmembrane domains.
  • To identify the optimal CAR T-cell construct for further clinical investigation.

Main Methods:

  • Generation of five lentiviral vectors encoding CD123-specific CARs with different hinge/transmembrane (H/TM) and costimulatory domains (CD28, 4-1BB) combined with the zeta (z) signaling domain.
  • Evaluation of CAR T-cell transduction efficiency, expansion, phenotype, and target cell recognition.
  • Assessment of CAR construct performance, including baseline signaling, anti-AML activity, and effector function.

Main Results:

  • Transduction efficiency, expansion, phenotype, and target cell recognition did not significantly differ among the generated CD123-CAR T-cells.
  • Several CAR constructs were eliminated due to significant baseline signaling (8.41BBz), decreased anti-AML activity (716.8.28z), or no improved effector function (28.28.41BBz).
  • The 28.28z CAR T-cells were selected for further development due to higher CAR expression on the cell surface compared to 8.28z CAR T-cells.

Conclusions:

  • The 28.28z CAR T-cell construct demonstrates favorable characteristics for targeting CD123 in AML.
  • Optimization of CAR design, particularly the selection of appropriate costimulatory and H/TM domains, is crucial for developing effective CAR T-cell therapies.
  • A clinical study (NCT04318678) evaluating the 28.28z CAR T-cells in AML patients is now open for enrollment.

Related Concept Videos