Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Archival Research

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.

PLoS biology·2025

Same author

Creating SPACE to evolve academic assessment.

eLife·2021

Same journal

Non-canonical amino acid incorporation enables minimally disruptive labeling of stress granule and TDP-43 proteinopathy.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Analysis of dendritic input currents during place field dynamics.

eLife·2026

Same journal

TopoMetry systematically learns and evaluates the latent geometry of single-cell data.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Neural activity profiles reveal overlapping, intermingled subpopulations spanning area borders in mouse sensorimotor cortex.

eLife·2026

Same journal

The exquisite mechanics of a tsetse bite.

eLife·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible.

Anna Hatch¹, Stephen Curry²

¹DORA, Rockville, United States.

|August 13, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) offers a framework to improve how research is evaluated. It guides institutions in overcoming obstacles, experimenting with new methods, and communicating changes for better scientific assessment.

Keywords:

careers in science culture change institutional change none research assessment research culture

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Research Assessment
Scientific Evaluation
Academic Policy

Background:

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was established in 2013 to address shortcomings in evaluating scientific research outputs.
DORA has since become a key initiative providing practical guidance for institutional research assessment reform.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline a framework for driving institutional change in research assessment practices.
To guide institutions in adopting more effective and equitable methods for evaluating research.

Main Methods:

The framework was developed through a collaborative meeting convened by DORA and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
It focuses on four key goals: understanding assessment obstacles, experimenting with new approaches, creating a shared vision for policy revision, and communicating this vision.

Main Results:

A four-goal framework for institutional change in research assessment has been proposed.
The framework addresses the practical challenges institutions face in reforming evaluation policies.

Conclusions:

Implementing this framework can facilitate significant improvements in how scientific research is assessed.
Adopting DORA's principles and this framework supports a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to research evaluation.