Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Nursing Evaluation
Surveys
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Archival Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.
Non-canonical amino acid incorporation enables minimally disruptive labeling of stress granule and TDP-43 proteinopathy.
TopoMetry systematically learns and evaluates the latent geometry of single-cell data.
Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible.
1DORA, Rockville, United States.
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) offers a framework to improve how research is evaluated. It guides institutions in overcoming obstacles, experimenting with new methods, and communicating changes for better scientific assessment.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Area of Science:
- Research Assessment
- Scientific Evaluation
- Academic Policy
Background:
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was established in 2013 to address shortcomings in evaluating scientific research outputs.
- DORA has since become a key initiative providing practical guidance for institutional research assessment reform.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a framework for driving institutional change in research assessment practices.
- To guide institutions in adopting more effective and equitable methods for evaluating research.
Main Methods:
- The framework was developed through a collaborative meeting convened by DORA and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
- It focuses on four key goals: understanding assessment obstacles, experimenting with new approaches, creating a shared vision for policy revision, and communicating this vision.
Main Results:
- A four-goal framework for institutional change in research assessment has been proposed.
- The framework addresses the practical challenges institutions face in reforming evaluation policies.
Conclusions:
- Implementing this framework can facilitate significant improvements in how scientific research is assessed.
- Adopting DORA's principles and this framework supports a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to research evaluation.