Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter 6 Months after Conversion Follow-up.
Lawrence Lin1, Katherine Cavallo Hom1, Eric J Hohenwalter1
1Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
The VenaTech convertible vena cava filter (VTCF) showed low adverse events at 6 months post-conversion. Converted VTCF had significantly less IVC thrombosis and migration than non-converted filters.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE).
- The VenaTech convertible vena cava filter (VTCF) offers a retrievable option for PE prophylaxis.
- Assessing long-term safety and device-related adverse events is crucial for IVC filter technology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate device-related adverse events at 6 months following placement or conversion of the VenaTech convertible vena cava filter (VTCF).
- To compare the safety profile of converted VTCF versus non-converted VTCF at the 6-month follow-up interval.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study involving 149 patients with VTCF implantation.
- Conversion to a non-retrievable state was attempted in 64.4% of patients.
- Imaging evaluation at 6 months was performed for 76 converted and 28 non-converted filter subjects.
Main Results:
- In converted VTCF subjects (n=76), only 1.3% experienced IVC perforation (>3mm strut outside lumen); no PE, migration, fracture, or IVC thrombosis occurred.
- In non-converted VTCF subjects (n=28), 14.3% had complete or near-complete IVC thrombosis; no PE, penetration, fracture, or spontaneous conversion was observed.
- Converted VTCF demonstrated significantly lower rates of IVC thrombosis and migration compared to non-converted VTCF.
Conclusions:
- The VenaTech convertible vena cava filter (VTCF) exhibits a favorable safety profile with low adverse event rates at 6 months in its converted configuration.
- Non-converted VTCF configurations are associated with a higher risk of IVC thrombosis.
- These findings support the safety and efficacy of VTCF conversion for reducing IVC-related complications.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

