Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

28:13
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
33.8K
Clinical Outcomes following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience
Demilade Adedinsewo1, Najiyah Salwa2, Susie Sennhauser2
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA, Adedinsewo.Demilade@mayo.edu.
Cardiology
|August 19, 2020
Summary
Watchman® device implantation for atrial fibrillation shows no difference in bleeding risk with antithrombotic choice. Smaller device sizes correlate with thromboembolic events, and peridevice leaks often persist.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman® device is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
- Current guidelines lack clarity on optimal antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulation cessation timing, and follow-up imaging post-Watchman® device deployment.
- Evaluating clinical outcomes after LAAC is crucial for refining patient management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess clinical outcomes in patients who underwent Watchman® device implantation for NVAF.
- To investigate the impact of antithrombotic strategies on bleeding events.
- To determine the association between device size and thromboembolic risk, and to evaluate the natural history of peridevice leak (PDL).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 231 patients who received a Watchman® device between January 2010 and December 2018.
- Cox-proportional hazard models were used to analyze the effect of variables on clinical outcomes.
- Analysis included bleeding events, thromboembolic events, and peridevice leak (PDL) progression.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in bleeding risk was observed based on the initial antithrombotic choice.
- Patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding had a higher risk of bleeding within 6 weeks post-implantation (HR 9.40).
- Smaller Watchman® device sizes (21 mm) were associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events compared to larger sizes (24-27 mm) (HR 0.15).
- Peridevice leak (PDL) size generally remained stable or increased on follow-up imaging.
Conclusions:
- Initial antithrombotic choice does not significantly impact bleeding risk following Watchman® implantation.
- Smaller device sizes are linked to higher rates of thromboembolic events.
- Longitudinal assessment of PDL indicates that these leaks often do not resolve spontaneously.
- Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and inform clinical practice.

