Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Coral Culture - Creating a Semi-Quantitatively Controlled Microenvironment System to Counter Current Limitations
Published on: July 21, 2023
Using the COVID-19 economic crisis to frame climate change as a secondary issue reduces mitigation support
Ullrich K H Ecker1, Lucy H Butler1, John Cook2
1School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, 6009, Australia.
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has understandably dominated public discourse, crowding out other important issues such as climate change. Currently, if climate change enters the arena of public debate, it primarily does so in direct relation to the pandemic. In two experiments, we investigated (1) whether portraying the response to the COVID-19 threat as a "trial run" for future climate action would increase climate-change concern and mitigation support, and (2) whether portraying climate change as a concern that needs to take a "back seat" while focus lies on economic recovery would decrease climate-change concern and mitigation support. We found no support for the effectiveness of a trial-run frame in either experiment. In Experiment 1, we found that a back-seat frame reduced participants' support for mitigative action. In Experiment 2, the back-seat framing reduced both climate-change concern and mitigation support; a combined inoculation and refutation was able to offset the drop in climate concern but not the reduction in mitigation support.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
What is Climate?
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Threats to Biodiversity
Fundamental Attribution Error
Sustainable Development

