Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

226
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
226
First Impression01:09

First Impression

107
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
107
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

117
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
117
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

340
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
340
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

126
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
126

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prefrontal inhibitory mechanisms associated with Putamen activity during valence learning revealed by multimodal fMRI-fMRS.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Integrated Ising model with global inhibition for decision-making.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Rate and noise in human amygdala drive increased exploration in aversive learning.

Nature·2025
Same author

Estimation-uncertainty affects decisions with and without learning opportunities.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Integrated Ising Model with global inhibition for decision making.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Veterans With Combat-Associated Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2024
Same journal

Neural timescales from a computational perspective.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Spinal cord Tau pathology induces tactile deficits and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease via dysregulation of CCK neurons.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal theta sweeps indicate goal direction during navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Just how goal-directed are hippocampal theta sweeps, anyway?

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Goal-directed hippocampal theta sweeps during memory-guided navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Connectomic evidence that ordered activity drives neuromuscular network formation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K

Prediction errors bidirectionally bias time perception.

Ido Toren1, Kristoffer C Aberg1, Rony Paz2

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Nature Neuroscience
|August 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prediction errors, which are crucial for learning, influence how we perceive time. This study reveals that these errors interact with time perception in the brain's putamen, with potential benefits or drawbacks.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Time perception and prediction errors are fundamental cognitive functions.
  • The striatum, particularly the putamen, is implicated in both functions.
  • A potential interaction between these processes within shared neural circuitry was hypothesized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between time perception and prediction errors.
  • To identify the neural substrates underlying this interaction.
  • To determine the effects of prediction errors on temporal judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized behavioral experiments to measure time perception under varying prediction error conditions.
  • Employed neuroimaging techniques (e.g., fMRI) to observe brain activity.
  • Applied computational modeling to analyze behavioral data and neural responses.

Main Results:

  • Positive prediction errors increased perceived time (time dilation).
  • Negative prediction errors decreased perceived time (time compression).
  • The putamen was identified as the key brain region mediating this interaction.

Conclusions:

  • Prediction errors significantly bias subjective time perception.
  • This interaction occurs within the putamen, a part of the striatum.
  • The influence of prediction errors on time perception can have both adaptive and maladaptive consequences depending on the context.