Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
Published on: May 19, 2023
T2 Relaxation Times at Cardiac MRI in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Christopher A Hanson1, Akshay Kamath1, Matthew Gottbrecht1
1From the Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division (C.A.H., M.S.), Department of Medicine (A.K., S.I.), and Department of Radiology (M.S.), University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St, Box 800158, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Mass (M.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (M.S.).
Abstract:
Background T2 mapping is an important cardiac MRI technique with applications in various conditions. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the T2 literature for normal values is lacking. Purpose To characterize the ranges of normal values and variability of myocardial T2 relaxation times using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the T2 literature. Materials and Methods PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched from June 2019 to January 2020 for myocardial T2 measurements in healthy adults. Studies quantifying T2 relaxation times conducted at 1.5 T or 3.0 T using gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) or T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequences were included. Summary means were generated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess factors causing heterogeneity. Results Of the 2481 articles retrieved, 42 studies were included with 954 healthy adults (mean age, 42.4 years ± 10.5 [standard deviation]; 538 men). The pooled mean of T2 across studies was 52 msec at 1.5 T (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51 msec, 53 msec) and 46 msec at 3.0 T (95% CI: 44 msec, 48 msec) (P ≤ .001). I was 98% at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Meta-regression at 1.5 T and 3.0 T identified vendor (β at 1.5 T = -4 msec [with Philips as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -5 msec, P = .02) and pulse sequence (β at 1.5 T = -5 msec [with GRASE as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -6 msec, P = .002) as significant covariates, but it did not identify any association with covariates of age (β at 1.5 T = 0 msec per year, P = .70; β at 3.0 T = 0 msec per year, P = .83) or sex (β at 1.5 T = -1 msec, P = .88; β at 3.0 T = 6 msec, P = .42). Conclusion The pooled mean of T2 relaxation times in healthy adults had marked heterogeneity across studies with field strength, vendor, and pulse sequence identified as covariates associated with T2. T2-prepared measurements were similar between vendors at each field strength. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
More Related Videos
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
08:41Assessment of Cardiac Function and Myocardial Morphology Using Small Animal Look-locker Inversion Recovery SALLI MRI in Rats
Published on: July 19, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT