Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endoscopic trans-pterygoid resection of a low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the infratemporal fossa.

World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery·2020
Same author

Virtual coach: the next tool in functional endoscopic sinus surgery education.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2019
Same author

Proximal suction tracheotomy tube reduces aspiration volume.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2008
Same journal

Advances in patient-specific 3D-printed models in temporal bone surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Graduated autonomy in head and neck microvascular surgery fellowship training: oncologic and reconstructive competency, safety, and educational implications.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Costs and system-wide considerations within head and neck reconstruction: moving toward a value-based care framework.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Modern methods of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Flap selection for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Improving facial scar outcomes: an evidence-based update.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

698

Bone conduction implants.

John P Richards1, John T Symms1, Kerry Beasley2

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
|August 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bone conduction implants offer solutions for various hearing losses. Newer active implants may overcome past limitations, improving outcomes and patient satisfaction.

More Related Videos

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

698
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Bone conduction implants have a long history of successful use in audiology.
  • Previous limitations included skin complications and restricted high-frequency hearing.
  • Advancements in technology are addressing these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current bone conduction implant technologies.
  • To identify hearing loss types benefiting from these implants.
  • To discuss patient-specific amplification options.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of bone conduction implant technologies.
  • Analysis of clinical outcomes and patient benefits.
  • Discussion of technological advancements and limitations.

Main Results:

  • Established bone conduction implants have been effective for over 20 years.
  • Newer active bone conduction implants show promise in overcoming previous limitations.
  • These advancements may lead to enhanced hearing gain and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions:

  • A diverse range of bone conduction implants are available.
  • Current options cater to various hearing loss types, severities, and patient needs.
  • Technological progress is expanding the benefits of bone conduction amplification.