Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
D-Dimer to Fibrinogen Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Patients After Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary
Yan Bai1,2, Ying-Ying Zheng1,2, Jun-Nan Tang1,2
1Department of Cardiology, 12636First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Insights
The D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is a novel predictor of mortality in cardiovascular disease patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Elevated DFR indicates higher risks of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Hematology
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- The coagulation and fibrinolysis systems play a role in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).
- The D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is a known biomarker for ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism.
- Limited research exists on the DFR's association with general cardiovascular disease prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the DFR as a predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To determine the relationship between DFR levels and long-term all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Patients undergoing PCI for CAD were divided into lower (DFR < 0.52) and higher (DFR ≥ 0.52) DFR groups.
- Primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) over an average follow-up of 37.59 months.
- Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models.
Main Results:
- The higher DFR group exhibited significantly higher rates of ACM (6.6% vs 2.4%) and CM (4.0% vs 1.5%) compared to the lower DFR group (P < 0.001 for both).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher incidences of ACM and CM in patients with elevated DFR (log rank P < 0.001).
- Multivariate Cox regression confirmed DFR as an independent predictor for ACM (HR = 1.743) and CM (HR = 1.695).
Conclusions:
- The D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is a significant and independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality.
- Elevated DFR levels identify post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients with coronary artery disease at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
- DFR represents a novel biomarker for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease following PCI.
Abstract:
The role of activation of the coagulation and fibrinolysis system in the pathogenesis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has drawn wide attention. Recently, the D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is considered as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism. However, few studies have explored the relationship between DFR and cardiovascular disease. In our study, patients were divided into 2 groups according to DFR value: the lower group (DFR < 0.52, n = 2123) and the higher group (DFR ≥ 0.52, n = 1073). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The average follow-up time was 37.59 ± 22.24 months. We found that there were significant differences between the 2 groups in term of ACM (2.4% vs 6.6%, P < 0.001) and CM (1.5% vs 4.0%, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that elevated DFR had higher incidences of ACM (log rank P < 0.001) and CM (log rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that DFR was an independent predictor of ACM (HR = 1.743, 95%CI: 1.187-2.559 P = 0.005) and CM (HR = 1.695, 95%CI: 1.033-2.781 P = 0.037). This study indicates that DFR is an independent and novel predictor of long-term ACM and CM in post-PCI patients with CAD.
More Related Videos
04:41Digital PCR for Quantifying Circulating MicroRNAs in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: July 3, 2018
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care