Content validity of patient-reported outcomes for use in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Jeremiah J Trudeau1, Jianming He2, Esther Rose3

  • 1Janssen Global Services LLC, 700 US 202 South, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA. jtrudea3@its.jnj.com.

Abstract

Insights

Patient Reported Outcomes instruments QUALMS and FACT-An show strong validity for assessing health-related quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. These tools are suitable for measuring HRQoL in this population.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Quality of Life Research

Background:

  • Lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) significantly impair patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
  • Accurate HRQoL assessment requires Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) instruments with established content validity in the target population.
  • The study evaluated the content validity of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) in lower-risk MDS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the content validity of the QUALMS and FACT-An PRO instruments in patients with lower-risk MDS.
  • To ensure these instruments are comprehensive and comprehensible for evaluating HRQoL in this specific patient group.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional, qualitative study involving 16 transfusion-dependent, lower-risk MDS patients (aged ≥18 years).
  • Semi-structured interviews included concept elicitation (CE) to identify patient-reported symptoms and impacts, and cognitive debriefing (CD) to assess instrument understanding and relevance.
  • A conceptual model was used to map CE concepts onto QUALMS and FACT-An for content coverage and suitability evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Commonly reported bothersome symptoms included fatigue/tiredness (100.0%), shortness of breath (87.5%), weakness (81.2%), and low energy (75.0%).
  • Key HRQoL domains affected were activities of daily living (100.0%), physical functioning (93.8%), emotional wellbeing (81.3%), and social functioning (75.0%).
  • Cognitive debriefing indicated that QUALMS and FACT-An were mostly relevant, well-understood, with easy response options and appropriate recall periods.

Conclusions:

  • Both QUALMS and FACT-An demonstrated strong face and content validity in the lower-risk MDS patient population.
  • These findings support the suitability of QUALMS and FACT-An for assessing HRQoL in patients with lower-risk MDS.